What Does "Lomo" Mean?

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
Funny thing is, I've seen "Lomography Film" for sale in a few stores - regular 120 in a nice fancy "LOMO" branded box, for way more than I could buy it in the regular yellow or green box. . . . . talk about ripping you off!!!

I guess if Lomo et al are not "real cameras", then all those people who started out using Box Brownies weren't shooting on real cameras either.

Who cares if they're overpriced, dark-boxes with coke-bottle lenses? The people that are using them are more often than not, overcoming the limited abilities of these plastic ogres to create some outstanding images; sure they results mightn't be to everyone's taste, but can't that be said for all forms of photography/art?

To each their own, and long live film - in any shape or form it is used to create pictures.
 

Chris Lange

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
770
Location
NY
Format
Multi Format
What's funny, is that you can practice "lomography" with any camera.

Sometimes I do it with my Rolleiflex, sometimes I do it with my Hasselblad.

I even do it with my Leica, Nikons, and Pentax 6x7 occasionally. Lomography is simply the overcoming of obsession with technical limitations and theory, and just giving plain old serendipity a chance.

Sometimes I shoot my 6x7 without the lens mounted, just held in front of the mount, so that I can tilt and shift as I please. A shroud of black duct tape is a serviceable enough bellows. That's pretty f*cking lomo, if you ask me.
 

marenmcgowan

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
58
Location
Richland, WA
Format
Multi Format

nice
 

EASmithV

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
1,984
Location
Virginia
Format
Large Format
It's like Cholo but for image quality
 

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
The Lomo store is making it easy for buyers to buy all they need in one hit; ($26.00 for a roll of expired Agfacolor 160 (12 years) could be an expensive experiment. . . . . )

Dead Link Removed

The sardine can camera is also rather neat:

Dead Link Removed
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,620
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
There are a few local places that sell lomography stuff. Some of them are labs and serious film outlets, and I'm quite confident that they also offer advice that would aid customers in moving from lower quality cameras to cameras that offer more control. I think that those who seek and/or use that advice have potential to strongly support the continued existence of film.

Other sources for lomography stuff are akin to gift stores. I have concerns about their contribution.
 

marenmcgowan

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
58
Location
Richland, WA
Format
Multi Format
If an interested party walks into the serious film lab/store, and they are embraced with a welcoming attitude...well, then, maybe they become another "supporter of the continued existence of film." I like to think that the buzz will get more people interested and excited, and along the way we'll get more converts.
 

Ken Nadvornick

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
What Does "Lomo" Mean?

It means more volume for the beleaguered manufacturers of photographic film.

It's just a funny spelling of the term for that...

Ken
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
What the Lomography company does is offering kind of package.
In times when film cameras, except for single-use ones, long have been wiped off the shelves, in some cities you can enter a shop with all these weird looking cameras and accessories and get all that fancy stuff.
The alternative of some 2nd hand film cameras sitting on the shelves of a camera store may not even exist in those cities.
There still would be thrift-shops and fleamarkets. But there the uninitiated would not even know what type of film that camera takes.

I got my Diana, still in box with bulb flash, at a fleamarket for 4€. But that was the only sample I saw in years. And I still would have to look for the bulbs. And had to clean the flash compartment from the residues of leaked batteries.

In a large city nearby I meanwhile can get a re-made Diana with kind of ever-ready electronic flash for about 20x the price I paid.
 

mfohl

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,182
Location
Westerville,
Format
Multi Format
I see some nerves have been touched here ...

I don't own a Lomo. But I did process yet another roll of film from my Holga. Along with a roll from my Nikon FM2. And I did some digital stuff over the weekend too. All of these are components of the medium.

Keep shooting. And don't feel superior.
 

kevs

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
711
Location
North of Pangolin
Format
Multi Format
I have a mixed opinion of the Lomo craze. I'm very glad it's here because it challenges the modern digital* hegemony that decrees that the subject of a photograph MUST be pin-sharp, and provides a small increase in film and processing sales. It may also provide a spur for these 'hipsters' to buy a more serious film camera and discover all that the medium has to offer. The only downside I see is the possible perception that ALL film photography is blurry, has wacky colours, vignetting, light leaks and other technical faults. Some folk just love to make false assumptions based on limited evidence... ;-)

*I'm well aware of Pictorialism, Linked Ring etc. but that's another thread.

Cheers,
kevs
 

Darkroom317

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
653
Location
Mishawaka, IN
Format
Large Format
kevs said:
The only downside I see is the possible perception that ALL film photography is blurry, has wacky colours, vignetting, light leaks and other technical faults. Some folk just love to make false assumptions based on limited evidence... ;-)
Click to expand...

That's my main problem with it
 

Stephanie Brim

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Considering that all they have to do is search 'film photography' on Google to see that this is not the case, why be worried about that?
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
If your only exposure to Stieglitz (or any photography) was his portrait of Oscar Bluemner, then you might think all photography was blurry, brown and contrastless.

The idea that those who use "lomo" cameras are so ignorant and ill-informed that they are incapable of looking further than wacky colours and light leaks ... well, I think it's a false assumption based on limited evidence, shall we say ...
 

Andy K

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
9,420
Location
Sunny Southe
Format
Multi Format
pdeeh said:
The idea that those who use "lomo" cameras are so ignorant and ill-informed that they are incapable of looking further than wacky colours and light leaks ... well, I think it's a false assumption based on limited evidence, shall we say ...
Click to expand...

I'd say that view is based on outright uninformed snobbery. But then I've never been one to mince my words.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Andy K said:
I'd say that view is based on outright uninformed snobbery. But then I've never been one to mince my words.
Click to expand...

I agree with Andy. There are a lot of ways to make a photograph. Running down someone else's isn't one of them.

As far as what things sell for, the market determines that. If you think you can do better for cheaper, consider yourself wise or lucky or both.
 

Andy K

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
9,420
Location
Sunny Southe
Format
Multi Format
jnanian said:
thats sweet andy !
i have a soft spot for slug bugs
l might be wrong but it looks like a 72'
Click to expand...

It was indeed a '72. A 1200 DeLuxe, upgraded to a 1600 with twin Webbers etc. Rebuilt from a wreck by my own hand. Best car I ever had.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
it's kind of sucks that photographers ( digital or chemical ) are so insecure
they have to cut down people who don't practice the same sort of photography as them.

i'd rather look at a stack of "flawed" images than a handful of clinical ones
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
Andy K said:
It was indeed a '72. A 1200 DeLuxe, upgraded to a 1600 with twin Webbers etc. Rebuilt from a wreck by my own hand. Best car I ever had.
Click to expand...

i feel for you. we had a 72 1600 and a 73 super ... both both rebuilt by us, both gone now ... the best cars i ever owned.
a neighbor a few miles away has one i see every time i ride my bike, i keep wanting to make him an offer and buy it from him ...
 

Stephanie Brim

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
I'd love one, but the problem is that my husband finds them very impractical when we can only get one more car. Heh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…