I had extensive experience with these and I can vouch for them:
1: Minolta X700and the SR-7, SRT 101, SRT 201, ...
3: Minolta X300
7: Minolta XE (heavy as a brick) !
9 : Minolta SRT200
OM4Ti must be number 1, I've had a few OMs but never the OM4Ti and still have an OM10 and a couple of lenses.
Canon AE1 Prog number 2. Still using a T90 and F1N and have the lenses and accessories
Pentax MX number 3. Had the ME super and great brand in that era. The manual MX is a class act
Minolta x700 number 4. It is a great camera, often thought about going Minolta
Minolta XE
Canon FTb
Pentax MX
Minolta X700
They are all great cameras; you can't lose with any one of them, as long as it works properly!
If the OM4 is given, then 3 minoltas; XE, X700 and SRT200 - because they are just nicer cameras than any of the others.
Can I be friends with your friends?
None of the above.
Assuming all are 100% factory functional . . .
1. Olympus OM4 ti because it has the best metering of all manual focus cameras ever released.
2. Minolta XE because it has the smoothest film advance of all the manual focus cameras.
3. Canon FTb because it is robust and all that is needed to make a well exposed frame of film
Do you have lenses for any?
Anyway:
XE
X-700 (insert batteries and fire it thirty times. If it still works, chances are it will keep working).
MX
FTb if in good condition
OM4 is a frail fucker.
Don’t bother I’d say. You can get lucky, but you’re never sure.
You can feed pigs with SR-ts, so strap scratches is a no-no.
Great camera otherwise.
But XE and X-700 will tide you over.
The XE is your most basic aperture priority capable manual focus camera but it has the smoothest film advance that is sheer pleasure to use.any reason for choosing the XE right after the Olympus ?
Read up on the history of the XE.The X300 is like brand new , my opinion was rocking between the x300 and the x700 but looks likei might keep both
i really love the OM4 ti , never thought its this leigh weight and good looking in person , it still in my ebay wishlist ! it came with a motor autowinder , but i have no lenses for it
any reason recommending the XE ?
all are working perfectly fine except the SRT200 , slow shutter speeds (2 - 4 and 8) locks the mirror up , the XE300 and the AE1 are in mint condition , zero scratches !
any reason for choosing the XE ?
haha sure
okay i will take none
any reason for choosing the XE right after the Olympus ?
Most of my lenses i have are for Minoltas , one lens for the other cameras except the Olympus.
any reason for choosing the XE ?
XE was baseline for Leicaflex R3 if that has any value. But it is smooth feeling camera. It has one caveat though: over time advance lever comes loose. Fairly simple fix but when it happens film advance is not reliable anymore until fixed. It appears to be assembly issue as is rather common ( I have 4 bodies and 2 had that). Lever feels wobbly when this becomes a problem or is about to. Other than that it is one of top cameras from that era and I value it more than XD.any reason recommending the XE ?
My list would be the OM4ti, the FTb, the XE and the X700...
Indeed, my bad. ME is a fine camera, ME Super was a lot better, but MX was ahead of them both. Pentax lenses helped them all without a doubt.For those who recommend the Pentax MX, there isn't one there, it's an ME.
My list would be the OM4ti, the FTb, the XE and the X700. The last two only because I don't have them already and I prefer them to the others I don't have (AE1P and ME). I have lenses for all of them.
Ronnie
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?