• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

What ASA should I rate these (very) expired films?

John51

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
I bought some rolls of 620. Not too bothered if the film is useless as I bought them for the spools.

Two rolls of Kodak Verichrome Pan. Expired 1981

Two rolls of Kodak Panatomic-X. Expired 1952

One roll of Ilford Selochrome. Expired 1952


Any hope of getting images from them? What speeds would you suggest? Box speed of the Verichrome Pan is 125 ASA. The other 3 don't have a speed printed on the box.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,601
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
IIRC, the speed loss is usually calculated at 1 stop per decade - so I'd rate the Verichrome at around ISO 16. It also depends on how it was stored - I'm guessing with it being that old, it probably wasn't frozen all this time. The Panatomic-X would be about an ISO 1 (it too was rated at 125, at least in recent years. I'm not sure what the official speed of Pan-X was in 1952). Same with the Selochrome. You will probably also need to use some benzotriazole in the developer to restrain fogging. There's lots of discussions here on how to do that.
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,623
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
Hmmm - I disagree with Scott about Panatomic-X -- it was rated at ISO 32 in its last incarnations -- Plus-X was 125. I've shot Panatomic-X from 1988 at ISO 25 with decent results. Slow films purportedly deteriorate more slowly, but 1952 is a lo-o-o-o-ng time ago! (So ultimately his suggestion of ISO 1 may turn out workable.)
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,601
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format

OOOPS- Dave you're right - I was confusing Panatomic-X with Plus-X as far as original box speed. But yeah, sixty year old film will be really off its speed.
 

Hatchetman

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
1,553
Location
Chicago, IL
Format
Multi Format
the verichrome should work out fine. add one stop (shoot at 50). It'll be fine. I doubt you get much of an image from the other stuff no matter what you do.
 
OP
OP

John51

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
The 3 older films came in the case with an early model Brownie Hawkeye that I bought for respooling duty. So maybe stored in an attic for the last 60 years?






 

nosmok

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
698
Format
Multi Format
The Verichrome should be great at half box speed. The Panatomic might be OK at 10-16, two stops down. I have no experience with old Ilford. I would expect nothing from the 50s stuff, and maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised. Especially if you like pictures of the backing paper numbers .

The best stuff from the 50s I ever shot was some 828 SuperXX, rated at 20 in full sunlight and got great results. Good luck!
 
OP
OP

John51

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
fwir, Kodak HC 110 seems to be low fog for old films, just the little push I needed to buy a bottle.

Sort of amuses me that I get to use the film reminder dial on my newly acquired Kodak Medalist.

How does this sound for the first roll of Panotomic-X, 2 shots each at ASA 2, 4, 8 and 16? If it's a dud, I'll put the 2nd roll up on fleabay as that box is undamaged. Might as well let a collector have it if it won't make images.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register