Seems like most of you here in Doltland are incapable of appreciating me--it's like casting pearls before swine.
Nice.don't feed the troll...
see previous similar thread: (there was a url link here which no longer exists)
remarkable excerpt:
That's the kind of grading I was expecting when I read the title of this thread...Those who were expecting a sincere topic might find interesting the catalog from Schott Glass which describes grades of optical glass
http://www.schott.com/d/advanced_op...al-glass-pocket-catalog-february-2016-row.pdf
Many of the top lens manufacturers make their own glass to their own specifications, rather than purchasing graded glass on the free market.
^^Schneider, Minolta used to,........My mind just went blank. I mean normal.
There's the lowest grade-no brilliance; the next one up (Series One, Sigma, some Tokins & Tamron)-some brilliane; then there's full brillance-Nikon & Canon; at the top is glow and sparkle-Leitz and Zeiss. At least that's been my experience. (w/older lenses)
Any phD's in optical engineering out there who can respond to such questions? This is like asking how many craters there are on the moon.
I'll do you one even better than a Ph.D who usually won't have decades of working knowledge in lens design.
It's all in ISO 172.
Oh and MIL-PRF-13830.
Maybe 10110 and ASME Y14.18M too even tho the latter is "sort of" obsolete.
flavio I think your info is old. The International Optical Design Committee of Designers Optical recently concluded that due to increased human activity the number needed to be revised to 10.87. They're still working on updating the units.
All this optical desine stuff is wonderful, but I needs real advice, and not about sines, removal of. The OP is a strong partisan of lenses made, and the more recently the better, by Leiss and Zeitz. Po' folks like me can't afford wonder lenses like theirs. Which inferior brands, such as Stigma, Cikon and Nanon, should we dare to buy, inferior beings that we are?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?