Grain, i.e Tri-x.
Palette, i.e. Velvia, Kodachrome, Portra.
Mark, can you elaborate a bit? Grain in B&W is a give away generally...to me anyway.
Palette????
I suppose there are digital enlargers now which will project a digital image for development on photo paper
...what are some of the traits that help you recognize the difference?
stradibarrius said:So I guess what I am hearing is that at the current state of technology a straight print show no real difference with normal viewing.
So I guess what I am hearing is that at the current state of technology a straight print show no real difference with normal viewing.
I know if I want a "lith" look the real deal looks better than a fake "lith" from photoshop.
Obviously we are discussing the what can be seen and not what can't be seen!!! I am not sure what your point is or how it adds to the discussion. All "captures must be processed somehow to make them "visible" whether analogue processing or digital processing. You eventually arrive at something that can be viewed!
There are no "intrinsic" properties of any image produced from a digital file. There is no standardization of A/D processing that produces the image. Therefore generalizations about 'digital images' may be faulty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?