Wearable light meter

Individual One said:

This isn't an original idea. It's the first time I've tried it. I find it quite handy, although the meter is much taller than a typical wristwatch and I think I might eventually snag it on something.
I printed it in PETG, but when I change out the filament to reinforced nylon I'll make one out of that and see how it turns out.
Bruce

View attachment 351158
View attachment 351159

Click to expand...

250swb said:

What exposures are you getting from the inside of your coat pocket?

Click to expand...

pentaxuser said:

??? What have I missed here?

Thanks


pentaxuser

Click to expand...

250swb said:

I don't know what you've missed, perhaps you've been cocooned from cold weather, not needing to put your hands in your pockets while wearing a light meter on your wrist, maybe you've never needed to wear gloves? Well good for you, keep sipping your Pina Colada, and don't worry about wearing a light meter on your wrist while a large percentage of the population of the Northern Hemisphere are now thinking about Winter. As regards the invention, great, so long as none of the above apply.

Click to expand...

pentaxuser said:

OK. I had just presumed that the gloved hand only needed to taken out of the pocket when the shooter was ready to check the light levels and take the picture when depending on the size of the glove it can be rolled away from the wrist if so required If the climate is so cold that this is dangerous then it is likely to be dangerous to try and handle even a camera

Still every to his or her own as they say

pentaxuser

Click to expand...

250swb said:

It was a simple observation that cuffs, pockets, gloves, etc could possible cause the settings to change, and I had no idea you could take it so, so seriously.

Click to expand...