Matt
Isnt the contrast in ziatype primarily controlled chemically and not so much by humidity?
Sullivan and Weesse make a book to explain a easily usable process and ziatype is easy to use but to make it easy the decide to control the RH and most of they wrote in their book about ziatype is true if you work over 50% RH . Under you'll need a developer. I rememberù when Dick wrote the first text on ziatype and make it available on his web page that he talk using the process from low RH to higher one. He wrote that a dry ziatype can be done but must be develop and so on.
In fact everything is possible but he could be mind boggling if you see all the possibility first.
I know humidity makes quite a difference in how far it prints out. Does it also affect contrast?
In their book DS and CA decide to work with RH which give full POP image , if they hadn't done that there will be a whole book on ziatype and all the possible variation from pizzigheli to sodium metaborate developer and so on.
Is Ware's method different from ziatype in how it reacts to humidity?
That's the point DS and CW decide to control the contrast chemically ( with bichromate, gold, sodium tungstate or special ferric salt) , Ware decide to control the contrast by the humidity these are 2 differents path but both works
The only thing I don't find clear with the Ware version is that in fact it is not a totally POP,process if you want to control the contrast by his method you still need to develop you print if you don't have the right DR in your negative.
Andrew I think BS should have some in stock but do not list it and artcraft should also have some. but if you want large quantity you may contact some chinese company.