Waist-Level Finders On 35mm Cameras

The thumbnail image on the focusing screen is good enough to frame the composition which you create in your mind when looking at the scene. It's like using a RF camera that way. With an eye level sir viewfinder the focusing screen image becomes your reality momentarily, and this doesn't happen with a RF camera (or waist level 35 sir) for me, anyway. But doing verticals sucks.

Seems like waistlevel finders were how 35mm SLRs started before the eye level prisms were introduced in the 1949 Contax S but that is well before my own collection.

These are what I have and they also work great for low level macro or copy work.

Les Sarile said:

Click to expand...

Interesting how the 1959 Topcon B and 1980 Pentax LX have the best seal around the screen.

That Topcon, along with the Super D, are very attractive cameras.

It's not the same as a WLF but you might consider a right angle finder attachment, which most SLR brands made.

mklw1954 said:

It's not the same as a WLF but you might consider a right angle finder attachment, which most SLR brands made.

Click to expand...

A more practical proposition, as right angle attachments were usually magnified. The conventional use for WLFs was studio work, where it would have been inconvenient and painful to crouch down for long periods. Even the much larger 6 x 6 screen can be difficult to focus without magnification, and 35mm WLFs were next to useless except as the most basic compositional aid.

DF said:

Is the Minolta XK the only 35mm camera to feature a waist-level finder?

Click to expand...

Can you expand on your original post to indicate what additional features you would like or what you are unable to achieve with the XK+WL finder?

The right angle finder - specially one with magnification option, is quit useful for low level or closeups. However, the eye relief is such that when you move your eye further away you see much less of the whole field of view.

A waist level finder presents a laterally inverted view while the top view from the Ricoh TLS401 is fully corrected just like the eye level view. However, it also has a very short eye relief like the right angle finder.




OTOH, sport finders - like one for the LX+FB-1+FC-1 below, are designed with eye relief as a main consideration. Although you can move your eye further away from it compared to the two options above, it will also begin to crop the field of view with distance.



The waist level finder is really the best option for the OP pending further clarification about what the XK waist level fails to deliver. The built-in magnifier also adds to the versatility.

bvy said:

The small and very compact Yashica T4 Super (also branded as the Yashica T5) has a very small waist level (more like elbow level) finder built into the body. It's the reason I bought the camera way back when, but now I hardly use it. Also, it can be hard to see in the wrong light, but there are times when it came in very handy.

Either way, the camera's a keeper. It has a very sharp Zeiss lens, and the most accurate autofocus of any camera like it that I've used.

Click to expand...

Yashica T3 also. The waist-level finder was called "N.A. Scope" which stands for "New Angle Scope" (why? Maybe out of complaints that it was not a true waist-level "finder", having only a coverage of 67%?).
Very useful not just for macro, but also for pictures taken with the self-timer, while putting the camera on a bench or some object on the ground.

Gary Winogrand did not bother with a 'waste' level finder...

I just bought a Yashica T4 Super (compact camera) last week. It has a waist level finder.
Cannot wait to put a few rolls through that one and see how practical it is.