phritz phantom
Allowing Ads
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2006
- Messages
- 211
- Format
- Medium Format
being a huge fan of the pictures and technique of w.Eugene smith, i browsed through the archives of APUG to find out a little more about his way of work. but surprisingly i didn't find much.
since he's considered one of the top printers of photography, I'd really like to find out more about his technique. I've read his part in the "darkroom" series many times. are there any other books on him recommendable?
I'd really like to read a good biography about him, especially with some info on his photographic work. I've been looking for " photography made difficult" for a long time now, but it seems to be unavailable around here.
the one thing I'm wondering about the most is whether he really used "d76 with ten times the normal amount of borax of kodalk"?
this would call for Gr of borax as opposed to Gr in the original formula (this source: here ) or maybe he meant the replenisher? but he was probably going for a more active developer for his high contrast images (maybe more shadow detail too).
other sources say he used Harvey's 777.
what photo paper would one use today if one wanted to go after his look? cold tone graded paper (grade 3 or 4?)? most likely not even available anymore. in "darkroom" he says the paper is polycontrast-f.
I'm also wondering about his his extensive use of pot.ferricyanide. for me it get the most use out of it with underdeveloped negatives, to push the highlights and upper midtones into position, or occasionally to enhance local contrast. but to really "open up the shadows" like he claims to, i could never really get that to work for me.
also i think i remember that he used to mount his pictures on black cardboard.
it would be very nice if someone could give me a few pointers for some good reading, and if people here used this thread to share some of their knowledge on this photographer - certainly useful to others too, since there seems to be no other thread focusing on his printing techniques - well, i wouldn't mind that too.
this was a pretty good read, i discovered while searching around, but probably old news to most people:
nyt times article
were his assistants and co-workers (if he had any) ever interviewed about their work?
yes, that info is pretty much confirmed by the "darkroom" article.Increasing the amount of borax is in most EK formulary. For the Minimata negs he used D76, 2:1 with water. I think this gets the chemistry he used to about Ansco 47, but don't hold me feet to that statement. Might be ansco 42?.
And he always insisted on a dollop of old developer "to take the edge off the grain."
i've recently seen the bit on w.e.smith in the "the genius of photography" documentary. it sounds like he was an intense personality, to say the least...If you don't like to smoke like Eugene, you can also take amphetamines by the bucket and work six days in a row with minimal sleep....
There is an article on W. Eugene Smith that discusses his use of local print bleaching in a special issue of _Photo Techniques_ called something like "Mastering the Art of Fine B&W Printing." I think it was special issue #10, but my copy is in storage at the moment, so I can't look it up to be positive.
Ferricyanide bleaching will bleach highlights faster than shadows, so if you've got a shadow area that's generally too dark, but has some highlight detail, bleaching will bring up that highlight detail and make the shadows seem more open, but if there isn't some tonal separation in the shadows to begin with, then bleaching won't help as much.
unfortunately not, i live in the middle of nowhere in europe. nothing available in libraries at all. according to amazon almost all of his books are not available too (except the pittsburgh one). i'll have to count on luck and ebay to find anything at all.If you live live in a major city as I do (LA),
thanks for your input. i'm not really planing to/ daring to go after his look. it was more of a hypothetical question. i just think his work is very inspiring and i got the impression that smith was rather open to sharing his knowledge, so some discussion about it could be interesting and fruitful.The only contribution I can make here: Kentmere makes a graded bromide paper available grade 2-4, so if that's what you wanted, you could get it pretty easily.
i only found this on the "photo techniques" site:
1995 Vol. 16, No. 6: Jim Hughes on W. Eugene Smith/Dignan NCF-41 / Medium Format
my biggest problem with the ferricyanide is avoiding streaks and to decide whether to use it mixed with the fixer or pure. smith recommended using it with the fixer or mixing fixer and ferri on the print surface.
thanks, i have the darkroom manual from barnbaum. a very, very comprehensive book.phritz,
I prefer to use ferri without fixer.
yes, that info is pretty much confirmed by the "darkroom" article.
but what does the EK stand for?
i've recently seen the bit on w.e.smith in the "the genius of photography" documentary. it sounds like he was an intense personality, to say the least...
and what a nice story, bob. i don't think i would ever had let go of that camera.
thanks, i have the darkroom manual from barnbaum. a very, very comprehensive book.
do you add the bromide or not? maybe being able to re-develop after having gone too far with the bleach sounds very convenient to me.
I'm completely unfamiliar with the man. What is he known for? Portraits? Nudes? Still lifes? Landscapes? Street photography? Commercial photography? Was he stylistically a modernist?
I'm completely unfamiliar with the man. What is he known for? Portraits? Nudes? Still lifes? Landscapes? Street photography? Commercial photography? Was he stylistically a modernist?
i only found this on the "photo techniques" site:
1995 Vol. 16, No. 6: Jim Hughes on W. Eugene Smith/Dignan NCF-41 / Medium Format
my biggest problem with the ferricyanide is avoiding streaks and to decide whether to use it mixed with the fixer or pure. smith recommended using it with the fixer or mixing fixer and ferri on the print surface.
also i lack consistency in using the bleach, it's either too strong or too dilute and having to throw out print after print because of overbleaching or visible borders depresses me too much over time.
i once mixed up a 10% stock solution for consistency reasons, but it didn't keep for long.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?