If I fix it, I will use it. I'm stubborn that way.It sounds like you probably won't use it. You likely can't sell it for much - you won't get back the money you spend on getting it fixed, if you get it fixed and then don't use it. I'd say sell it.
It was cheap ($45) and local. I assumed it would need shutter service and maybe even patching in the bellows area. The former is certainly true, but the latter seems unnecessary. The film-counter/anti-DE issue was unexpected given the overall condition.Why did you pick it up?
Aside from the Hawkeye, no, I haven't. I liked the results I got from the Hawkeye and was looking for a step up in quality, making the Perkeo seem like a good choice. But, the reality of a CLA and possibly other work is giving me pause. Good point on just trying it out. I might do that since I have a roll of 120 B&W film in the fridge.Have you shot medium format before? You mention a Hawkeye, but the results from the Perkeo will be in a different league because of the better lens. If you want to see what it is about medium format that gets people using it, the Perkeo is a great opportunity now that you have it. Most likely the higher speeds are usable so run a roll through it and see what you think. If it appeals to you after a roll or two, get it cleaned up. If good quality medium format doesn't do much for you sell it on.
I do want to use it, but I don't want to invest real money into it only to find out the results are "meh".This is an easy one to resolve. Do you want to use it, or do you just want to sell it?
I get a bit weary of buyers who just pick up a camera to flip it, usually at a profit, but then dither, and want us to decide for them what to do. Respectfully, you have to decide why you bought the camera, and guide yourself according as to your decision as to what to do with it.
I have a Perkeo I, the earlier model without the exposure counter and no double exposure prevention. It's a good little shooter, and easily fits into a pocket when I go bush walking, even when I take along the usual accessories, a lens hood, a yellow-green filter, an exposure meter, and a few rolls of film. It's not a DSLR, but it does good work for what it is.
Overall the Voigtlander Perkeo was a fine little 120 folder in its day when these cameras were what most people bought and used - ditto Zeiss Netters, Agfas, Anscos and at least a dozen other brands. However, it's an early 1950s camera with all the usual limitations of a folder. If yours has serious mechanical problems, and you didn't pay too much for it, then let it go, for a fair price. If it works, with a little care in using it, you will be amazed at the quality of the images you can get out of it.
It's really that simple.
The Perkeo II is a nice little camera, great for carrying when weight and space are at a premium. The frame counter only works when you flip the lever (you can get a manual at butkus.org) so it can appear not to be working. DISCLAIMER: I've never tried checking the film counter without loading film - while I believe it may work with the back open and the lever flipped, I don't know and don't wish to try.
I can see it being a bit fiddly to get good images
I'd figure on the total price of that camera being closer to $150 once service and postage is considered, but if you're okay with that, have fun!I recently picked up a cosmetically perfect Perkeo II with the Synchro-Rapid shutter, Color-Skopar lens, and even an intact leather carrying case for cheap. Externally it looks virtually new and the bellows appear to be light tight. Unfortunately, the shutter is very slow on the lower speeds (seems close to correct on 1/100 and above), there is some dust in the lens, and the frame counter mechanism isn't working right (at least as far as I can tell by manually moving the rollers).
Hmm. I have one. It is a joy to use but I never got a satisfactorily sharp image with it. I grumbled about it to my friend and neighbor Charlie Barringer (google him, he's a co-author of the Zeiss Ikon Compendium). He had one too, had the same difficulties with it. I grumbled about it to my friend Eric Beltrando (dioptrique.info). He remarked that the Color Skopar isn't a particularly good Tessar clone.
The Perkeo II is quite complex. I'm not sure who's up to repairing them.
I keep mine to maintain negative bragging rights and because its cute. Also because sharpness is somewhat overrated. But if I ever blunder into another one and find myself owning it, I'll sell it "as is, where is, no returns, bid accordingly" to get out from under the mistake.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?