Vietnam War Cameras

chip j

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,193
Location
NE Ohio
Format
35mm
The regular, old olive-drab left-over Speed Graphics were the official US Army camera in Germany at that time. I was a US Army Still Photographer in the 97th Signal Battalion Photo Platoon at that time and that's what we were issued and had to use almost all the time. We had a M3 for 35mm slides.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format

Nikons were not given away. Back then they were also very expensive. Choices between Nikon and Leica had more to do with personal preferences than cost. Also, news agencies often supplied cameras so cost wasn’t a factor.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,470
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Wasn’t the Graflex XL the official military camera?

Depends on the exact time, and which branch. I was an Air Force photographer, and XL's were the standard for the Air Force, but were a relatively new standard in 1972, we had Nikon F's for 35mm work (mostly slides).
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
Wasn’t the Graflex XL the official military camera?
I"ve seen stories of photographers "accidentally" losing their XLs out the window so they could switch to a Nikon. The government bought the Graflex on contract -- it was a buy-american thing -- but anyone could see a 35mm camera was vastly superior for combat work.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,256
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
Yes, I have read that too. I just got one of those XL's. I have wanted one since about 1970. The promise seems so great, Zeiss lenses on a rugged American-made Graflex body. Apparently they were much disliked by the photographers who were assigned to use them. The idea of using it in a combat situation just seems ludicrous, it is fairly large, unwieldy, only takes a few frames per roll and has no interlocks between the shutter and film advance-- primitive compared to the Nikon F.
 

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
484
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
In 1969-70, I was assigned to a public affairs office in the Navy. While we had a number of Photographer's Mates at Quonset Point NAS, we had some Mamiya C-3's, a couple of Speed Graphics, and some Nikon F's without metered prisms. I often used my own Pentax Spotmatic, since I was familiar with it, and I also had my own Minolta Autocord for medium format. I didn't like the Speed Graphics because they were so big, and the Mamiya's were always checked out by the CPO's.

Over at Quonset Point, they had a very well stocked camera shop, since they also did a lot of portrait work for officer purposes.
 

GRHazelton

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
2,249
Location
Jonesboro, G
Format
Multi Format
Somewhere I have a copy of a USN manual for Photographer's Mate. I seem to recall that, in addition to much valuable material, a sequence taken with a 4 x 5. probably a Speed Graphic, of a carrier landing gone amiss. Since I've used a 2 x 3 Speed Graphic I can only imagine that the unnamed shooter either was using a film pack, or was incrediably dexterous. He would have loved to have given a motor drive camera of any make!
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,256
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
"In 1969-70, I was assigned to a public affairs office in the Navy. While we had a number of Photographer's Mates at Quonset Point NAS, we had some Mamiya C-3's, a couple of Speed Graphics, and some Nikon F's without metered prisms. I often used my own Pentax Spotmatic, since I was familiar with it, and I also had my own Minolta Autocord for medium format. I didn't like the Speed Graphics because they were so big, and the Mamiya's were always checked out by the CPO's."

That makes a lot of sense. The C3 is a great camera to use, and rugged. No wonder they were checked out. By 1970 the Speed Graphic had long been overtaken by the convenience of the TLR. Your Spotmatic with the built in meter and great lenses was a sweet spot at the time and affordable. I had one back then, it was my first "good" camera. A nice one came up on the classifieds recently and I bought it for old times sake. That M42 mount is so versatile. I like using even today!
 

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
484
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
I traded the Spotmatic in for a Nikkormat in 1973. But, last winter I bought a Pentax Spotmatic ESII and and SPII. I love using them!
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,470
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Guys complained about the rangefinder accuracy on XL's, also they were a little slow to use since the film advance and shutter cocking were separate. Early on, I had a chance to switch over to a Rollieflex TLR, and I didn't use XL's all that much. Later the AF settled on Koni-Omegas, which were a big improvement.
AF photogs weren't in on much ground combat, so small cameras weren't such a priority, though guys flew in the back seat of RF-4's and in larger combat aircraft using those XL's. Even Nikon F's can get pretty heavy at 4 or 5 G's.

OTH, the still photographers had it pretty easy compared to the motion picture guys who were toting Arriflex 16 mm movie cameras around, XL's are lightweights in comparison.
 
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,221
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
An excellent perspective.....Thank You
 

Photoguy365

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
44
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
There is an excellent book called "Requiem" that came out in the late 90s early 2000s, that documented several Vietnam photographers who wee killed in action. The images are hauntingly beautiful. I am constantly reminded that as technology has advanced, photographers have gotten lazier. Once upon a time, photography was about capturing a moment. There was an art to it. Now we just blow 100 shots and pick the best one in the camera.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
I am constantly reminded that as technology has advanced, photographers have gotten lazier. Once upon a time, photography was about capturing a moment. There was an art to it. Now we just blow 100 shots and pick the best one in the camera.
Speak for yourself.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
It was a generalization. Most new photographers don't understand the fundamentals of photography. Or know the smell of fixer..lol!
Much as people around here want it to be true, knowing the smell of fixer is not a prerequisite to being a good photographer.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,256
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
The funny thing is, when you look at it, great photography hasn't gotten "better" over the last 150 years. Can we document more things in more different ways than ever before? Yes. But great photographs are just that, great. Just because we have more technologically advanced equipment and materials than a hundred years ago the creation is in still in the vision of the eye and mind of the photographer.

Did painting "improve" with the development of acrylic paints?
 

chip j

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,193
Location
NE Ohio
Format
35mm
I suppose an argument could be made that better materials have led to lousy art in all fields.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
I suppose an argument could be made that better materials have led to lousy art in all fields.
Yeah, you can argue just about anything. How convincing you would be is an entirely different matter.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
The Spotmatics are still a "sweet spot", I have a yardsale SPF, an SP1000, and an H1a - although I'm pretty heavily committed to Nikons as a system, I'm putting together a basic Pentax outfit because they're so nice to use, my favorite is the 1000.
 
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,221
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
The Spotmatics are still a "sweet spot", I have a yardsale SPF, an SP1000, and an H1a - although I'm pretty heavily committed to Nikons as a system, I'm putting together a basic Pentax outfit because they're so nice to use, my favorite is the 1000.
There are 3 or 4 Pentax 35mm i would Love To Own.
But i have a similar Problem/Issue as yourself.....Lots of lens and bodies for Nikon...and Canon, Oly and Minolta.
I am almost 60 and do not give enough play time to the cameras i own now.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
Many of the best of old photographs have survived to become icons of their era. They certainly look good when compared to most of today's infinite selection of images. The best of the nearly 100.000 photos I've taken with Nikon DSLRs over the past 7 years are perhaps a little better than the best of ten thousand film photographs accumulated over the previous six decades. However, the average of the digital images is poorer. With the DSLR I sometimes bracket because it is faster than analyzing a histogram. I also take more photos of trivial subjects.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
There are 3 or 4 Pentax 35mm i would Love To Own.
But i have a similar Problem/Issue as yourself.....Lots of lens and bodies for Nikon...and Canon, Oly and Minolta.
I am almost 60 and do not give enough play time to the cameras i own now.
I have the Nikons, once my only 35 was an F with lenses, a working outfit at one time. Now, 5 Nikon bodies and a couple more focal lengths, they're cheap, sometimes free. A Kiev/Contax rf outfit, with 2 Kievs and one Contax & lenses from 35 to 135. Then a couple Rolleis, a Standard & an Automat, both free. A 4x5 and an 8x10, which were nowhere near free. All of the preceding get used regularly, some more than others, lately the rfs and the Rolleis getting the most use. The other 35 or so cameras get used when the mood strikes me, 5 or 6 are about to be given to a nearby community college though, all K-mounts.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,221
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Again, i have a similar problem with the Canon A-Series..... they were fine cameras, but i could not put them to use...just too many other 35mm bodies.
Even with a 100 dollar CLA and 30 dollars of shipping, i could not get 80 dollars for an A-1 or AE1-P. I donated one of each to my local college as well. I still have one of each model remaining.
I guess i will try soothing real cheap...maybe 60 bux with shipping included and see if i can find the other two a good home, with a member on APUG.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…