Very odd problem with Foma 400 bulk roll

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,614
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
A few months back I bought a bulk 100 foot roll of Foma 400. The first rolls all came out well, E.I, 320 to 250 depending on the camera and developer. I used Acufine, Diafine at 320, D76 and HC at 250. Then the roll seems to have lost 2 to 3 stops of speed. At first I thought my developers were just getting old, toss the developers, then thought my camera was off. I had been using a Minolta 800si, then I used a 600si, and today Minolta X700. I am now using Clayton F76+, a roll of Foma 200 came out spot on, the roll of bulk loaded Foma 400, 2 to 3 stops off. I shot at 250, developed for 8m at 68 degrees 1:9. After I doubled checked the X700 with my Gossen meter, spot on. The bulk load in well within date, never had such an issue. Tommarow I going to shoot a ring around with a large test chart and see what ISO it is acutally shooting at, best guess at this point is 50.
 
Joined
May 28, 2025
Messages
19
Location
Plato
Format
Multi Format
I could believe a faulty thermostat could cause ripening or finishing temperatures to be too low, and cause the emulsion to be lower speed (or too high and create fog), but I wouldn't expect it to change mid roll. Even if emulsions are added to the coating hopper mid coat, I would expect the film to show multiple speeds, and I don't believe there's a way to load backwards and shoot through the AH layer. Do you have a roll that looks properly, and then under exposed? Even if the film did transition between emulsions, I doubt you would cut the film at exactly the transition spot, or that it would be dead straight across the base.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,518
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
My thought is to check camera with a roll of something else like Tri-X or HP5, factory loaded cassettes. Use a fresh factory developer too.

These new fangled E-lectronic cameras can't be trusted.

Sunny 16 some of it in manual.
 
OP
OP

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,614
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
My thought is to check camera with a roll of something else like Tri-X or HP5, factory loaded cassettes. Use a fresh factory developer too.

These new fangled E-lectronic cameras can't be trusted.

Sunny 16 some of it in manual.

I did with a roll of Foma 200, it came out fine.
 
OP
OP

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,614
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
My thought is to check camera with a roll of something else like Tri-X or HP5, factory loaded cassettes. Use a fresh factory developer too.

These new fangled E-lectronic cameras can't be trusted.

Sunny 16 some of it in manual.

I will use a Konica T with 50mm on manual with a Gossen SCB meter. I have fresh bottles of Clayton F76+ which is single use, both the Acufine and Dinafine were replenished and were getting a bit long in the tooth, although in the past I've had replenished Dinafine going for a year.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,518
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format

 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,523
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I cannot begin to think of how a standard B&W film like Foma 400 could lose 2-3 stops in a short time. It's hardly the world's most advanced film but it's reliable stuff.

Are you bulk loading into DX coded cassettes? Are you using the DX coding? I am not familiar with the cameras you mention so I don't know if they detect DX coding but it strikes me that could be one error if the cassettes are not coded correctly, or of the contacts in the cameras are dirty. A number of cameras annoyingly don't actually indicate what ISO is selected when DX coding is used.

As another poster suggested, are you certain that the film was bulk loaded correctly with the emulsion facing the lens/shutter?

This must be some kind of user error or user equipment failure. A bulk roll doesn't suddenly lose 2-3 stops.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,262
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
By any chance were the speed-loosing rolls spooled such that the base faces the lens when loaded into the camera, as one would do for redscaling of colour films?

This is a possibility, though I'd expect to lose more than three stops in this case. The one time I've done this (misloading film in a plate camera's film sheath) the loss was four to five stops.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…