Vancouver police update camera/cell phone seizure policy

What is this?

D
What is this?

  • 3
  • 9
  • 125
On the edge of town.

A
On the edge of town.

  • 7
  • 6
  • 195
Peaceful

D
Peaceful

  • 2
  • 12
  • 358
Cycling with wife #2

D
Cycling with wife #2

  • 1
  • 3
  • 131

Forum statistics

Threads
198,297
Messages
2,772,488
Members
99,592
Latest member
lordsamdoom
Recent bookmarks
1

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Well, now. This is different from what we usually hear.

Probably because it's a policy and has to follow the actual law rather than the ill informed abuse of the law some officers carry out.


Steve.
 

23mjm

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
450
Location
Rocklin, Cal
Format
Medium Format
This policy is no surprise to me---It follows the law, taking pictures in not against the law and a camera is private property. Law Enforcement can't arbitrarily and capriciously take property with out cause. Now they really can push what probable cause is to arrest you then take it, but that is a whole different issue.
 

aluk

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
162
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
Law Enforcement can't arbitrarily and capriciously take property with out cause.

I think you mean that they may not -- but in fact, they do anyways in many cases, especially when the citizenry knows no better. This, of course, is why a clarification of the law is a welcome move by the police force.
 

23mjm

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
450
Location
Rocklin, Cal
Format
Medium Format
I think you mean that they may not -- but in fact, they do anyways in many cases, especially when the citizenry knows no better. This, of course, is why a clarification of the law is a welcome move by the police force.

So I guess you failed to read the rest of my comment!!!! :confused:
 

aluk

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
162
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
So I guess you failed to read the rest of my comment!!!! :confused:

I did read it, but I still suspect that in many cases police would order photos destroyed even if they were entirely unwilling to actually arrest people. That is, they might not desire to arrest anyone, but would order people to stop shooting anyways.

I try to imagine that cops are not malicious enough to fabricate reasons for arrest, but are rather usually acting out of ignorance...
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,053
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Many years ago in Oakland, CA, my old photo professor (a street photographer) was arrested and tossed in jail because he "accidently" photographed a policeman -- who just happened to be taking a bribe from a pimp at the time. Fortunately the professor used his one call to call a city official he knew and was released (without the film).

So guidelines or no guidelines, WYA (watch your a**).

Vaughn
 

walter23

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
1,206
Location
Victoria BC
Format
4x5 Format
Sweet. If you make it past the police tasers in the airport you'll be able to photograph stuff, hassle free :wink:
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom