UV Source - Reflection Between Gaps

eumenius

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
768
Location
Moscow, Russ
Format
Medium Format
Ah, that's what I thought about - low transmission of short UV rays through regular glasses, and 254 nm UV is indeed too dangerous (though cancer is too much for it, one gets faster burned to bones rather to contract cancer from mercury lamps). So the longer, softer UV is way much better for a regular darkroom, of course. I just remembered the UV tables with deep-violet UV filters in them, some are more than 18*24cm - each containing ~400W worth of 254 nm bulbs... we use it in our lab to visualize and cross-link DNA molecules. Ooops, that's the trouble with human beings

 

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
sanking said:
There are some speciality glasses, such as bososilicate, also known as fused silicate, and quartz, that transmit a very high percentage of light below 300 nm. But this glass tends to be very expensive and not easy to find.

I think there is a bit of confusion here, just like at the start of the thread with the "anodized" aluminum...

I'm guessing that "fused silicate" should actually be called "fused silica", and it is not related to borosilicate glass. Fused silica is another term for quartz glass. It is composed of relatively pure silica, SiO2, which also found in the mineral quartz.

Borosilicate glass is the type of glass that is found in Pyrex and Kimax laboratory type glassware. Borosilicate glass conatins boron in addition to silica.
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
Yes, borosilicate and fused silica (quartz) are different animals. My apologies for the confusion.

But regardless there is little to be gained with speciality glasses of this type, and the risk to human beings of radiation below 300 nm is significant.


Sandy


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
26
UV absorbing paint pigments

Hello. I am new to the forum and scanning for information related to building UV printing light sources. This thread is very interesting.

About painting the surface behind the bulbs. If you choose to do so you should expect a portion of the light to be re-emitted with a wavelength shift. This will be a varying amount of the light as much will pass through and be reflected by the metal (thus having a second pass and chance to be absorbed and re-emitted). Paints heavy with titanium dioxide are classic UV absorbers and re-emit within the visible spectrum.


You sometimes see this effect used to reduce reflected UV into exhibit cases housing sensitive museum/gallery artifacts.

Regards
 
OP
OP

Neil Poulsen

Member
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
520
Format
4x5 Format
Just Finished Today

I just completed my uv source today. It works great. Again, thanks for all the input.
 

photomc

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Messages
3,575
Location
Texas
Format
Multi Format
Neil Poulsen said:
I just completed my uv source today. It works great. Again, thanks for all the input.

Congratulations Neil....hope you have a great time using it, Oh! And don't forget to post something for us to see
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…