eumenius
Member
Ah, that's what I thought about - low transmission of short UV rays through regular glasses, and 254 nm UV is indeed too dangerous (though cancer is too much for it, one gets faster burned to bones rather to contract cancer from mercury lamps). So the longer, softer UV is way much better for a regular darkroom, of course. I just remembered the UV tables with deep-violet UV filters in them, some are more than 18*24cm - each containing ~400W worth of 254 nm bulbs... we use it in our lab to visualize and cross-link DNA molecules. Ooops, that's the trouble with human beings 

sanking said:There are several reasons people do not use these type of tubes. UV radiation at the 254 nm range is extremely dangeous to human beings, and the risk is much greater than just skin and eye burns as it is known to be a cause of cancer.
And second, ordinary soda lime float glass, which most of us use in our contact printing frames, blocks a very high percentage of UV radiation below 350 nm, and virtually all of it below 300 nm, so not only is radiation at 254 nm very dangerous, it is also useless.
There are some speciality glasses, such as bososilicate, also known as fused silicate, and quartz, that transmit a very high percentage of light below 300 nm. But this glass tends to be very expensive and not easy to find.
Sandy