UV Light Recommendation

Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 7
  • 1
  • 64
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 111
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 6
  • 222

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,743
Messages
2,780,205
Members
99,691
Latest member
jorgewribeiro
Recent bookmarks
0

Bruce

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
202
Location
Centerville
Format
35mm
All

What recommendations do you have for UV lights? One of my friends wants to build a UV box and he is unclear of the bulb type that he should use.

Also- if you have any suggestions on how high the bulbs should be over the contact print frame, please provide that info.

Thanks!


Bruce
 

tom_micklin

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
242
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
All

What recommendations do you have for UV lights? One of my friends wants to build a UV box and he is unclear of the bulb type that he should use.

Also- if you have any suggestions on how high the bulbs should be over the contact print frame, please provide that info.

Thanks!


Bruce

Hi,
I bought mine from this site Dead Link Removed
But there is also a lot of information on bulbs, etc. plus a Build-It-Yourself kit.
If you check out the UV FAQ, I think you'll find the information you're looking for on distance from the bulbs to the frame.
Hope this helps,
Tom
 
OP
OP

Bruce

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
202
Location
Centerville
Format
35mm
Tom

Thanks for the info. My friend and I also found some very good info in the "Platinum and Palladium Printing" book by Dick Arentz.

Bruce
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
629
Location
Sacramento
Format
Medium Format
Bruce,

Generally, the BL lamp (blacklight, not BLB-blacklight blue) os considered the best lamp for the iron processes. It's possible to us aquarium lamps (AQ or AQA) as well, and some of those are HO and VHO lamps, which will speed the printing time. You need special ballasts for HO and VHO lamps, though.

As for distance, it's not critically important, but you generally want the lamps as close as you can get to the print frame glass within reason. Most people put theirs about 2-3" away. It's generally better to be closer rather than farther.

Space the lamps as close together as possible. for T12 lamps, most people put them at 2" O.C., which leaves a 1/2" gap between the lamps. Any closer and you may have problems getting the lamps in and out of the sockets.

Make sure the lamps extend beyond the desired printing area by at least 4" or so on each edge, or you may experience some exposure falloff into the edges.

Put a good reflector behind the lamps. Use a metal one, and tie it into the ground. Make sure you have good ventilation on the lamps and the ballasts, as the assembly will heat up considerably, and the heat will reduce the output of the lamps, and possibly shorten lamp and ballast life.


---Michael
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
I have an article on printing with UV light sources at http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Light/light.html

The article was written a number of years ago but most of the information is still relevant.

The BL tube is the best all-around tube for printing with alternative processes IMO, though if you are printing only with the iron processes one could make a case for the SA or AQUA.

I have found some real peculiarities in printing with the iron processes. For example, the only difference between the BL and BLB tubes is that the latter has a filter that cuts out all light over about 420 nm, and the iron processes clearly have a lot of sensitivity to light over 420 nm. AQUA tubes don't radiate any light below this wavelength, but they print pt./pd. about as fast as BLs. Yet in practice the light over 420 nm seems pretty much wasted with the BL tubes because they don't print much faster than the BLBs. I don't say that as a point of speculation because I have actually compared the printing speed of BL and BLB tubes with a number of alternative processes in the same light fixtures, and the speed advantage of BL is really minimal, less than 1/4 stop.

I actually prefer the BLBs because the strange light highlights every speck of dust on the vacuum glass which makes it easy to keep it spotless. Of course, you should wear UV goggles when you look at the light.

Another consideration in favor of the BLB tubes is that many local store keep them in stock since they are a kind of novelty item, at least in my area of the country. If you want BLs you have to order them, and last time I ordered 48" BL tubes half of them arrived crushed.

Sandy King
 

Loris Medici

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
1,154
Location
Istanbul, Tu
Format
Multi Format
Dear Sandy,

What can you say about dichromate processes such as gum or carbon? Do you think light above 420nm can affect speed and contrast of the emulsion in case of dichromated sensitizers?

Thanks in advance,
Loris.

...Yet in practice the light over 420 nm seems pretty much wasted with the BL tubes because they don't print much faster than the BLBs. I don't say that as a point of speculation because I have actually compared the printing speed of BL and BLB tubes with a number of alternative processes in the same light fixtures, and the speed advantage of BL is really minimal, less than 1/4 stop...
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
Dear Sandy,

What can you say about dichromate processes such as gum or carbon? Do you think light above 420nm can affect speed and contrast of the emulsion in case of dichromated sensitizers?

Thanks in advance,
Loris.

Loris,

If you compare the BL to the BLB tubes I really don't believe that light over 420 nm affects speed and contrast very much, if at all, with the colloid processes. The reason is that the colloid processes have very strong spikes around 360nm, and the spikes over 400 nm are just to weak to have much overall impact. I print with carbon all the time and have tested this by comparing BL to BLB tubes and there just is not very much difference.

On the other hand, if you print with a light source that puts out little or no radiation below 400 nm so that all of the exposing light is over this wavelength then I believe you do see an increase in contrast. You can actually print carbon with a type of tube knowns as the "daylight" tube, and although exposures will be much longer than with BL or BLB, you definitely get more contrast.

Sandy King
 

timeUnit

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
590
Location
Göteborg, Sw
Format
Multi Format
I built a UV box a while back using 6 Philips Actinic 05 tubes. I've used it for cyanos and gum bichromate. I took a bit of thinking to understand the wiring, as I didn't have so much to go on, but it seems to work fine. I have two 4 inch fans on each side of the "box" to cool things down. It's not really a box though, more like a hood. Or a roof with two walls.

Exposure with cyanos, 8-15 minutes. With gum, 3-12 minutes depending on mix.
 

RobertP

Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
1,190
Format
ULarge Format
I have an article on printing with UV light sources at http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Light/light.html

The article was written a number of years ago but most of the information is still relevant.

The BL tube is the best all-around tube for printing with alternative processes IMO, though if you are printing only with the iron processes one could make a case for the SA or AQUA.

I have found some real peculiarities in printing with the iron processes. For example, the only difference between the BL and BLB tubes is that the latter has a filter that cuts out all light over about 420 nm, and the iron processes clearly have a lot of sensitivity to light over 420 nm. AQUA tubes don't radiate any light below this wavelength, but they print pt./pd. about as fast as BLs. Yet in practice the light over 420 nm seems pretty much wasted with the BL tubes because they don't print much faster than the BLBs. I don't say that as a point of speculation because I have actually compared the printing speed of BL and BLB tubes with a number of alternative processes in the same light fixtures, and the speed advantage of BL is really minimal, less than 1/4 stop.

I actually prefer the BLBs because the strange light highlights every speck of dust on the vacuum glass which makes it easy to keep it spotless. Of course, you should wear UV goggles when you look at the light.

Another consideration in favor of the BLB tubes is that many local store keep them in stock since they are a kind of novelty item, at least in my area of the country. If you want BLs you have to order them, and last time I ordered 48" BL tubes half of them arrived crushed.

Sandy King
What about the AmerGraph ULF-28?
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
What about the AmerGraph ULF-28?


The AmerGraph ULF-28 is a great UV light that prints a lot faster than a bank of BL tubes.

But the question was about making a unit with tubes as I recall?

Sandy King
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,644
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
All

What recommendations do you have for UV lights? One of my friends wants to build a UV box and he is unclear of the bulb type that he should use.

Also- if you have any suggestions on how high the bulbs should be over the contact print frame, please provide that info.

Thanks!


Bruce
I use a face tanner and tested for the best distance.
 

Dan Williams

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2003
Messages
262
Location
Enumclaw, WA
Format
Multi Format
I just rebuilt my UV lightbox. It did have (4) 24" fluorescent fixtures with BL lamps. I removed the fixtures and installed UV LEDs. The lights come in 5 meter rolls and can be cut to required length. I wound up using three rolls and a single 12 volt power supply. I haven't had the opportunity to try it out yet but, from what I have read, I am expecting to get shorter printing times. I'm going to be away from home for a couple of weeks but when I get back I intend to start using it. I'll report beck on what I find.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom