I have an article on printing with UV light sources at
http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Light/light.html
The article was written a number of years ago but most of the information is still relevant.
The BL tube is the best all-around tube for printing with alternative processes IMO, though if you are printing only with the iron processes one could make a case for the SA or AQUA.
I have found some real peculiarities in printing with the iron processes. For example, the only difference between the BL and BLB tubes is that the latter has a filter that cuts out all light over about 420 nm, and the iron processes clearly have a lot of sensitivity to light over 420 nm. AQUA tubes don't radiate any light below this wavelength, but they print pt./pd. about as fast as BLs. Yet in practice the light over 420 nm seems pretty much wasted with the BL tubes because they don't print much faster than the BLBs. I don't say that as a point of speculation because I have actually compared the printing speed of BL and BLB tubes with a number of alternative processes in the same light fixtures, and the speed advantage of BL is really minimal, less than 1/4 stop.
I actually prefer the BLBs because the strange light highlights every speck of dust on the vacuum glass which makes it easy to keep it spotless. Of course, you should wear UV goggles when you look at the light.
Another consideration in favor of the BLB tubes is that many local store keep them in stock since they are a kind of novelty item, at least in my area of the country. If you want BLs you have to order them, and last time I ordered 48" BL tubes half of them arrived crushed.
Sandy King