UV light meters and UV light sources?

.

A
.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 35
Kentmere 200 Film Test

A
Kentmere 200 Film Test

  • 4
  • 1
  • 80
Full Saill Dancer

A
Full Saill Dancer

  • 1
  • 0
  • 112
Elena touching the tree

A
Elena touching the tree

  • 6
  • 6
  • 195
Graveyard Angel

A
Graveyard Angel

  • 8
  • 4
  • 149

Forum statistics

Threads
197,774
Messages
2,764,082
Members
99,466
Latest member
GeraltofLARiver
Recent bookmarks
0

Jim Benson

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
18
Format
4x5 Format
I’m looking to start alternative processes, beginning with cyanotypes, and perhaps going beyond that.

My plan is to use a halogen work light as a UV source.

From what I understand, the output of these varies over the life of the lamp, and even to some extent of the duration of a printing session, which seems to call for a UV light meter.

Does anyone have a suggestion for a reliable light meter that is not too expensive? (a relative term, I know.)

Is it possible to save any significant money by trying to make a DIY version wthout sacrifgicing reliability?

And does anyone have any thoughtds as to whether here would be a better choice for a light source?
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,158
Format
4x5 Format
You might be able to get one of the sunburn detectors pretty cheap.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Ordinary glass blocks UV radiation of wavelengths shorter than 360 nm. This is barely into the UV region which starts at 400 nm. For shorter wavelengths fused quartz must be used instead of glass. For any UV source you need to check its output before use.

Probably the best source of UV is from a mercury arc lamp such as used for tanning. Once it warms up its output should be quite constant. They typically have a very long life. This would remove thae need for any metering.

Have you looked at alternative process sites they have some useful information?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,759
Format
8x10 Format
Skin is a UV meter. So are eyes. Just remember that when working around UV light sources.
 

Jim Noel

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,261
Format
Large Format
You will be far better off, and richer, to buy, or build a good UV source instead of the hot, low UV output work light. Then you won't need the expensive meter.
Google "alternative photography" and you will be directed to more good information than you can absorb in a short time..
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
I don't think you need a UV meter. All you have to do is run tests with your alternative process along with your UV light box. If the output of your box is consistent, your test prints should reveal the speed of your materials. Just take good notes. I did my test on my UV light box with a Stouffer step wedge and a densitometer. Just like with any photographic material, the aim is to expose the minimal amount for the maximum density in the darkest part of the print. My LED UV light box for cyanotypes has been consistently 7 minutes with my brand of OHP film if you want to go that route.
 

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
You don't *need* a UV meter, but you might find one useful. I have been making alt prints of various kinds for many years, and I just got one of these:
Dead Link Removed

My UV tubes are very consistent, but I think I will find some creative uses for this (for example: moving between sun and BL tube exposures).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom