Using Single 8 film in a Super 8 camera

sophisee

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
10
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Has anybody had experience with using Single 8 film in a Super 8 camera? I know the cartridges are completely different, but I was wondering if I could open the Single 8 in a dark room and roll it into a Super 8 cannister - or even just roll it in a way that it would work in a Super 8 camera. I'd buy another Single 8 camera but I'm getting sick of buying products that are broken or incompatible. I know it'd be a strange way of doing things but the effects could be interesting. What do you think?
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
It would be a hassle respooling the film.

"but the effects could be interesting"

I can't imagine any effects aside of the hassle.
(Well, if your Super-8 camera relies on the speed setting by the cartridge, respooling could lead to a wrong setting. But that could be achieved more simple by just manipulating the Super-8 cassette.)
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,833
Format
Multi Format
sophisee, what interesting effects do you have in mind? The only reason to use Single-8 film in a Super 8 camera is to get to use a Fuji emulsion that will do something no Super 8 emulsion will do.

When I was shooting movies (Super 8, although I bought a ZC-1000 for its lens, which I thought I might use on one of my Beaulieus) people talked about Soviet imitation Super 8 cartridges that were said to be reloadable. As far as I know they were a myth. Super 8 cartridges as made in the west aren't reloadable.

Reloading film received in a Super 8 cartridge into a Single 8 cartridge is possible, and for me would have been a way of shooting K-40 (usually with a conversion filter in front of the lens) in my ZC but just wasn't worth the effort.

About used small gauge cine cameras. If Lenny Lipton (see The Super8 Book) is to be believed a substantial fraction of new Super 8 cameras were dead when received from the factory. My first, a Yashica SU-60E, was. Aged ones are even worse. Back when I was buying used S8 cameras, the only ones I bought that were consistently OK were early egg-shaped Bauers. But my sample was small and I may have been lucky.

You can't avoid taking chances. Pick a format/packaging (8/8, Single-8 if you think you can get the film, Super 8, DS8) and stick with it.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
"but the effects could be interesting"

Today there are various fresh emulsions available from third party suppliers converted to Single-8 or Super-8. That would save you the hassle of opening the cassette and of respooling.
You might play with old unexposed Super-8 cassettes or "treat" them before exposing.
 

tokam

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
586
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Multi Format
I'm not sure that single 8 film would feed properly in a Super 8 camera. Issues with sprocket hole size, positioning and spacing.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Single-8 and Super-8 films as such are identical in standards, except for:

-) base material

-) base thickness
 

Alex Muir

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
407
Location
Glasgow, Scotland
Format
Medium Format
There used to be a quarterly magazine published in the UK called International Movie Maker. It was produced by Roy Salmons who had a shop called Photoworld in Craig y Don, Llandudno. I subscribed for a few years as it contained lots of good info about small gauge cine. I'm sure there was an article at one stage about re-loading Super8 cartridges. From memory, however, it was not that easy. I'm guessing you have some Single 8 stock you want to use, but the cameras have been unreliable? I've never used Single 8, or had a hold of one of the cameras, but they were mentioned regularly in that magazine. Users seemed to be very keen on them. I have bought, and used, a number of Super 8 cameras over the years and they have all worked. The most reliable has been a Canon 514XL which has the advantage of running on two AA batteries without a separate meter battery. Some of the older models, like the Bolex 150 series don't always give accurate exposures, but more recent cameras have all been ok. I know the claimed advantage of Single 8 is the use of a proper gate in the camera to keep the film flat, but I've had some fairly good results with Super 8. I suppose it depends on what you are filming. I would think that re-spooling Single to Super would be risky, and a last resort. If you have a load of Single 8 film and want to move on to Super 8, you might be safer selling it.
Alex.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,324
Format
4x5 Format
Sprocket hole size is different.

Super-8 sprocket holes are smaller.

At least working in your favor... larger holes would accommodate a smaller feed mechanism. So reliability of feed might be an issue but maybe a minor one.

The gate is different too, but this wouldn't impact your experiment.

Super-8 projectors often supported both formats with the flip of a switch. Mine might use the same feed for both, which would help answer feed reliability (if a projector can easily feed both, no reason a camera wouldn't be able to.)
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Bill, you are mixing up Single-8 with Standard-8.


The latter was also called Double-8.
Who gave names to all those animals...?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,560
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format

No, obviously you can't put 16mm wide film in a super 8 cartridge or camera. Unless you intend on splitting it in the dark first and loading it into a re-used cartridge. LOL.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
Why not just buy some Super8 fresh cassettes?
Adox makes a B&W film and Wittner makes some colour films.

Some people really like to complicate things.
If Super8 was dead, I can imagine wanting to re-use other formats. But that isn't the case.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
4,829
Location
İstanbul
Format
35mm
I am using double x foma 100 r bw film in my bolex c8 as a single frame camera. Wittner is good but they requested 45 euro with postage per ektachrome double x , yes 4000 or less frames but 45 euro is 45 euro , it makes hell of money in turkish lira , may be this summer not earlier. Some canon cameras are excellent , hell of color and leica feel. I would not stop to invest in 25 dollars via ebay and use these new kodak films.
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,833
Format
Multi Format
No, obviously you can't put 16mm wide film in a super 8 cartridge or camera. Unless you intend on splitting it in the dark first and loading it into a re-used cartridge. LOL.
ic, Single8 is not 16 mm film. It is the same width as Super 8, has the same perforations and the perforations are located the same distance from the top of the frame. Frame sizes are the same too. The two can be and have been intercut. As has been mentioned earlier in this discussion, the only differences between the films besides the cartridges they're packed in are in the base material and thickness.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
And with latest conversions even these principal differences may be gone (as with current Agfachrome in Super-8 cassettes).
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…