After some experimentation with changing lenses and bodies, I was able to determine that the issue was not specific to the EF 24-105mm IS STM lens. It seems that the problem is on the body itself.
But now that begs the question, did using the 1.2V batteries cause the body to fail? Or is it just coincident that the body started failing when the 1.2V batteries were used?
I hadn't thought of it this way before but this is a really good point that puts my mind at ease about the low voltage not being the reason my camera stopped working.Using 1.2v batteries won't cause the body to develop a fault .
Otherwise the alkaline batteries they are designed to be used with would have caused the same damage when they ran low .
Yes, I know they exist. But I haven't really heard good things about them. Except some individual posters praising some particular brand. No one 1.5V rechargeable battery receives universal praise.There are rechargeable 1.5V AA. They are actually 3.7V Li-Ion with a regulator built in.
The body without the battery pack/grip takes two CR123A, and the battery pack/grip takes either 4x AA or 2x CR123A. I use it with 4x AA.How many CR123 if you use them? How many AA for the pack?
I hadn't thought about dirty contacts. I can give this a try somehow don't feel confident this will fix it.Have you scrubbed every contact you can see, including the cells themselves?
I depleted CR123A numerous times but never counted how many rolls. If I had to guess, I'd say 20 rolls of 36 per set of batteries, and flash has its own batteries. Note that I use AF and IS. Also leave the camera on all the time but I don't think it drains battery just by being on. I have never depleted 4xAA batteries as I recharge them every 10 or so rolls, max 15 rolls.You should be getting around 100 rolls of 24-exposure film on a set of cells, without strobe.
As another data point, I'm recalling now that showing the low battery indicator does not necessarily indicate a power issue, it is a a general error indicator. I previously had a different defective lens which on the EOS 7 produced a low-battery shutdown when the shutter is fired but on a digital body, the same lens produced an error on the screen when the shutter was fired, so something bad with the lens. Which is evidence that the low power indicator on EOS7 is a general error indicator.
On this body, I took the film out and fired with the back open. The shutter moves, but it never opens completely. Maybe the camera is trying to report that the shutter has failed. Which is not surprising given the age of the camera and the fact that I probably put hundreds of rolls through it. It probably died of old age. Too bad because if I am to replace it, it will cost double what I paid for it originally.
There is no gunk or dirt visible on the shutter curtains when I open the back. And regarding the isopropyl alcohol fix, even if I fix it now, I don't think I'll trust this camera again. Either the shutter will fail again when I'm out and about or it won't expose properly and it'll be too late before I realize. I'd rather pay the 10,000 yen to buy another one (although I suppose I would never know if the previous owner had issues with it that he or she repaired at home).Do you have degraded foam that is causing black gummy streaking on your shutter? If so, try using these paper strips and q-tips very gently to get all the black stuff off, while actuating the shutter.
Visually inspecting the contacts, there is no visible dirt on it. It seems unlikely that the camera would receive power (enough power to rewind the film even) but not enough to fire the shutter. I think in 99% of cases, either it makes contact with the batteries or it doesn't. There's no in-between.
As another data point, I'm recalling now that showing the low battery indicator does not necessarily indicate a power issue, it is a a general error indicator. I previously had a different defective lens which on the EOS 7 produced a low-battery shutdown when the shutter is fired but on a digital body, the same lens produced an error on the screen when the shutter was fired, so something bad with the lens. Which is evidence that the low power indicator on EOS7 is a general error indicator.
On this body, I took the film out and fired with the back open. The shutter moves, but it never opens completely. Maybe the camera is trying to report that the shutter has failed. Which is not surprising given the age of the camera and the fact that I probably put hundreds of rolls through it. It probably died of old age. Too bad because if I am to replace it, it will cost double what I paid for it originally.
there is probably a smaller camera in the viewfinder that watches your eye
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?