This sounds interesting, and you're making me curious, albeit more at a theoretical than a practical level. Forgive me the perhaps silly question, but you mentioned this:
I know pigment density along with the amount of sensitiser will have an effect on tissue height and contrast
I get what you're saying here, but I don't connect this with photogravure. It sounds more like carbon-transfer talk to me.
Having done photopolymer intaglio as well as carbon transfer, I am aware of the (potential) overlap between both processes, but I have never proceeded to the stage of copper plates and instead stuck with polymer plates for the intaglio work. All digital-based, so no real aquatint/rosin box or film-based screens or anything.
I did consider using a photopolymer and mating it onto copper plates and then etching the copper that way. Like I said, I never went that route, but wouldn't that be by far the easiest solution for you as well? I know many people today work that way and materials are relatively easy to get. Photopolymer is a breeze to work with compared to gelatin. And it's sensitized 'by nature' anyway. For intaglio work, exposure isn't very critical since you're only talking halftone and no continuous tone; given a decently collimated/point light source (this is the critical part!!), there's a lot of leeway.
Perhaps the essence of what you're doing went totally over my head; in that case, please explain a little more about your printing approach.