leeturner said:Thanks Bob. I've seen the rather heated discussions about different types of light source and there is a noticeable difference, but let's not get into that old argument. One advantage I am finding is that the diffuser seems to lessen dust and the like on the neg. The room I have my equipment in is unfortunately carpeted but I have put a large antistatic mat down which helps to a certain extent. I'm working on "she who must be obeyed" to fit a laminate floor in the room but our priorities, as usual, seem to differ.
I'll plug on for the next few days and hopefully wil be able to post some examples next week. One major advantage over my previous darkroom is that with lens prices at a ridiculously low level I'm now able to print with significantly better glass than before.
True enough, but see the link below for what can happen to your nice laminate floor if a pipe springs a leak under it at 2 a.m. and you need to get at the pipe quickly...Kapten Stofil said:See http://www.inbio.com/Your_home.html about good arguments for laminate floors instead of carpets. There is more muck in a carpet than you really care to know.
leeturner said:Hi
I thought that with direct light MG printed at approximately grade 2 so are the filters (using Y and M) also acting as a type of ND filter? It looks as though it's going to take me a while to calibrate the filters to my purpose. Is is worth setting up the other enlarger with below the lens filters and adjusting the colour filtration to match these results or should I just do what I used to do and go with what looks right?
leeturner said:With split grade printing would it then be correct to use the single filtration method as logically grade 0 and grade 5 are only using one colour.
/QUOTE]
For spilt grade I just turn the knobs all the way. No need to worry about what the exact grade is for the two exposures. At least I doubt there is. FWIW when I tested my old durst I got much lower then grade 0 with full yellow. At least that's what I remember.
leeturner said:WHy the disparity when both settings for grade 0 are in effect using 0M? Is this so that exposure times for the next grade up using 2 colour filtration are not affected?
With split grade printing would it then be correct to use the single filtration method as logically grade 0 and grade 5 are only using one colour.
leeturner said:Hi
I've finally got a darkroom up and running for the first time in 5 years. In my previous darkroom I had a simple condensor with under the lens MG filters.
I managed to get hold of a couple of Durst Mod70 enlargers with the colour heads plus and old L1000 that I'm fixing up.
Last night I tried printing for the first time with the Mod70. I was under the impression that MG paper printed at a default grade (is it G2?) with no filters. So I tried a print with the colour box switched out and the exposure times were much faster than what I was used to e.g. 4 seconds for an 8x10 from a 6x6 neg. Much too fast for me. I then tried turning the lamp down but still not much luck. I then switched in the filters and adjusted them for a grade 2 and the times dropped to a manageable 9 to 12 seconds. Again I thought that with direct light MG printed at approximately grade 2 so are the filters (using Y and M) also acting as a type of ND filter? It looks as though it's going to take me a while to calibrate the filters to my purpose. Is is worth setting up the other enlarger with below the lens filters and adjusting the colour filtration to match these results or should I just do what I used to do and go with what looks right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?