Well, I've only used this method for a while. I'm still playing with it and have had good success although some pictures are screwed up. But that could be from other issues as I'm new to 4x5 cameras. Right now I'm trying to see how issues caused by the difference in stops between the camera and film might affect my process. I'm looking for ideas. Thanks.It seems like a valid and interesting approach. Does it not work well for you?
What's his name or link. I'd like to see his work. Where can I see your work?I also know a photographer who uses a 4/3rds camera I believe, closer framing to 4x5, and uses it as a viewfinder/light meter.
He does amazing work. I've used my.phpne before in a pinch and have been pretty spot.on.
What's his name or link. I'd like to see his work. Where can I see your work?
Yes. That's who I got the idea from in the first place. But I'm still confused by the stops difference issue between camera and film and would like to explore that further.
The digital camera has a zoom lens. If I zoom in, I can do a 1-3 degree spot reading with it.I use to do this, when I had cameras with no light meter and I had no hand held meters. You can use a grey card and spot meter that via digital camera for an easy all around value to work with. A grey card is about a Zone V. Obviously this would be tough to use on far away subjects.
Yes, this is what would concern me - the correlation between film ISO and digital sensor ISO sensitivy. I have couple of good Gossen meters plus a few Canon FD bodies that I trust so it might be time to drag a couple of old Olympus 4/3 cameras which don't get much use and see how the meter readings compare. If the variance in readings is reasonably constant then it should be practicable to program in exposure compensation on the digital camera and proceed from there. This would need to be done for each digital camera separately.I know I'm going to stir up a hornet's nest here Alan, but in the U.K version of the magazine Professional Photographer a few years ago did extensive tests to see if several different digital cameras sensors gave the same results as a light meter on film, the conclusion they came to was that with each manufacturer's digital camera the sensor was calibrated to that particular camera's sensor and that the results on film without using a light meter couldn't be relied on to give accurate exposure. In short for example, 100 I.S.O even on different makes and models of digital cameras are not the same.
P.S. I have no axe to grind I don't even own a digital S.L.R.
And you can visualize the effect of the graduated ND on the LCD while looking at the histogram. I used to use an Olympus M43 camera and set up the clipping indicators to match my metering for b&w film. It also had the option to shoot 1:1 and with the right lens I could visualize and meter the scenes I shot with my Bronica SQ-A.I might need a graduated ND filter to keep everything in range
I checked my digital camera against my handheld meter and it appears they're the same readings. That was the first thing I checked when I started using the camera as a meter. Maybe it's coincidental with my camera. I'm using an Olympus E-PL1 micro 4/3. I think it was their first micro 4/3 model. The handheld is a Minolta IIIF Autometer. Of course, if the readings are different after checking, you can then adjust the ISO setting to offset the error.I know I'm going to stir up a hornet's nest here Alan, but in the U.K version of the magazine Professional Photographer a few years ago did extensive tests to see if several different digital cameras sensors gave the same results as a light meter on film, the conclusion they came to was that with each manufacturer's digital camera the sensor was calibrated to that particular camera's sensor and that the results on film without using a light meter couldn't be relied on to give accurate exposure. In short for example, 100 I.S.O even on different makes and models of digital cameras are not the same.
P.S. I have no axe to grind I don't even own a digital S.L.R.
Yes, this is what would concern me - the correlation between film ISO and digital sensor ISO sensitivy. I have couple of good Gossen meters plus a few Canon FD bodies that I trust so it might be time to drag a couple of old Olympus 4/3 cameras which don't get much use and see how the meter readings compare. If the variance in readings is reasonably constant then it should be practicable to program in exposure compensation on the digital camera and proceed from there. This would need to be done for each digital camera separately.
That is a problem when I shoot Velvia 50. The digital camera's lowest setting is 100 so I have to add a stop. I also shoot Ektachrome 100, Tmax 100 and Tmax 400 so those ISOs can be set. .Black and white film has enough range so that using pretty much any digital camera for meter reading should work out fine. Color reversal film is another story, but I only shoot color on digital, so that's not an issue for me. One drawback to using a digital camera as a meter is some don't have the low ISO range I sometimes use for film, so calculations and compensation needs to be done. Although I end up using a flash meter for readings, I often use a digital camera as a preview (like Polaroid in the old days) when shooting with strobes.
I don;t have a DSLR. But if I did, I don;t know if I want to use it as a meter. It;s so much larger than the micro 4/3 which is about the same size as most hand held meters. I also keep it in my camera bag just in case.Yes, this is what would concern me - the correlation between film ISO and digital sensor ISO sensitivy. I have couple of good Gossen meters plus a few Canon FD bodies that I trust so it might be time to drag a couple of old Olympus 4/3 cameras which don't get much use and see how the meter readings compare. If the variance in readings is reasonably constant then it should be practicable to program in exposure compensation on the digital camera and proceed from there. This would need to be done for each digital camera separately.
This assumes that the difference is both consistent and linear.Of course, if the readings are different after checking, you can then adjust the ISO setting to offset the error.
I think you meant it would be in the film's range. That makes sense. The Olympus has a dynamic range DR of between 7 and 10 depending Assuming film is less, then if clipping shows on the digital camera's histogram, it might not be apparent on film. So my lowering the exposure setting a half of a stop if it does show clipping is just a safe measure.And you can visualize the effect of the graduated ND on the LCD while looking at the histogram. I used to use an Olympus M43 camera and set up the clipping indicators to match my metering for b&w film. It also had the option to shoot 1:1 and with the right lens I could visualize and meter the scenes I shot with my Bronica SQ-A.
The main issue is that the histogram is based on a jpeg image created for the LCD display, and not the raw image, so even if the image is clipping on the screen it might be within the sensor range. You could easily run several tests with a roll of 35mm and then adjust the clipping indicators accordingly if your digital camera allows for it. Each digital camera/lens combination need to be tested as they all show different histogram readings.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?