you can ask for a hand inspection and in the US airports they are required to give it to you. outside the US, every airport is different. just put all your film in a clear ziplock and have it out in your hand and say you want this hand inspected. the rest of you stuff on the belt ready to go thru the scanner
john
Yes, there was a thread in the past on CT scanners. It seems to have initially focused on the EU implementation and went on and on and on from there. It's probably way to long to be useful.I am puzzled. We had a very long thread on the new scanners in airports that are either in situ or shortly will be and these based on both on Kodak's and Ilford conclusions were that they all seriously damaged all film. At that time the U.S. had the advantage over the rest of the world in that hand inspections, if requested, were a flyer's right or so I thought.
No mention of the new and "lethal" scanners in this thread or what I thought was established, the flyer's right to hand inspections
What has changed or did I simply get the info about the new and lethal scanners and flyer's right to a hand inspection wrong?
pentaxuser
Thank you.Date added to thread title - for when this thread comes up in searches in later years.
Yes, there was a thread in the past on CT scanners. It seems to have initially focused on the EU implementation and went on and on and on from there. It's probably way to long to be useful.
Regarding US TSA, a lot of people think that hand inspection is an inalienable American human right. It is not. The TSA site basically says you can ask. That's as far as the "flyer's right" goes. TSA will comply at their desire and ability. Generally they are quite accommodating. But I've been told that workload is too high and they were understaffed... once or twice out of hundreds of flights over the past decade. None in the past 2 years so can't speak to the most recent other than what folks report in these threads. TSA guidance online (their own, not reports of what people think they say) makes it perfectly clear that there are no guarantees and their procedures change based on security posture etc, etc.
BTW, few seem to recall the days before TSA... when gate security was done by private contractors hired by the airlines. There was little consistency then and very little courtesy. While TSA went through a learning curve, they seem to have come to grips with the fact that they serve the public, work toward being courteous, and make an unpleasant experience as pleasant as possible with the new tools they are given. The fact remains, they are low paid and not all scholars so one can't expect too much more from than than one expects from a clerk at a fast food restaurant.
So answering your question, I don't think anything has changed and you may have had a slightly inaccurate impression. Following these threads... It's easy to happen so not your fault.
Regarding CT... there seem to be some conflicting initial input from folks lately. I, personally, when seeing a CT will be asking for a hand inspection and hoping that they comply. If they don't/can't I'll probably trash the film and take pictures with my iPhone.
Depends on which machine. Try it and let us know. Or ask James; I’m sure 007 traveled with them.So they can tell if you have a few Minox cassettes in your pocket?
I like the idea of slower film (I usually use HP5) and just sending it through the scanner with the rest of my carryon stuff.
The CT is perplexing if one reads photo forums. The industry says they will cause damage. I believe that. On a thread here or elsewhere someone posted damage but it didn’t have CT characteristics. On a thread here or elsewhere someone posted that they tested a roll through a CT with no signs of damage.Thanks Brian. Maybe I needed to pay more attention to that previous thread but you are right I had not realised that a hand inspection even if you are courteous and arrive with plenty of time to spare is not in fact a right. Nor did I realise that there was any doubt about how damaging the new CT scanners are for all films
pentaxuser
If traveling to a large metro area with well stocked camera shop, take a few rolls ask for hand inspection, then buy film when you arrive, mail exposed rolls back to your home address.
That assumes the film you want, in the quantity you want, is fresh at any random place you go. How will you know? By making intercontinental calls to every camera stores across the ocean?
So they can tell if you have a few Minox cassettes in your pocket?
I like the idea of slower film (I usually use HP5) and just sending it through the scanner with the rest of my carryon stuff.
If you go through one of the millimeter-wave scanners (the kind where you stand sideways and raise your hands above your head), it will detect a pocket zipper, a key, an extra piece of paper. These are at all major US airports I've seen in the last few years. Don't even think about carrying film in your pockets any more.
Just bring a clear plastic bag to hold your film cans. If they don't have a CT scanner, at ISO 400 or less you can put it though the x-ray for carry on bags. If they do have a CT scanner (which are much newer looking), hand TSA the bag, say it's film, and ask for hand inspection. I only did this once in the US in the last few years, but there was no problem.
Would you consider 400 film instead? Would be a slightly more discriminating experiment....Hawaii
vacation
Luck boy!
Would you consider 400 film instead? Would be a slightly more discriminating experiment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?