I’m looking to get into an argument about chemistry, the limitations of trying to replicate Crawley’s formula, or whether or not it will make a difference to use the crystal form—I’m just hoping to find a supplier where I can buy some and give it a shot myself
I’m based in NYC and there’s another user nearby (Saganich) who posted that he was able to obtain some. But, alas, I guess I am too new to the forum to have the ability to send a PM.
Hi all,
I’m looking for a source that will supply educational or lab grade (not ultra pure or re-agent) Potassium Carbonate in 1.5 H2O form to a private individual based in the US.
Would like to try the original formulation or FX-2 for some old-school emulsions. I’m aware of the many substitutes available and have most of those on hand. I’ve searched the archives, and read both DCB and FDCB.
I’m looking to get into an argument about chemistry, the limitations of trying to replicate Crawley’s formula, or whether or not it will make a difference to use the crystal form—I’m just hoping to find a supplier where I can buy some and give it a shot myself.
I’m based in NYC and there’s another user nearby (Saganich) who posted that he was able to obtain some. But, alas, I guess I am too new to the forum to have the ability to send a PM.
Thanks in advance for any help. Much appreciated.
You're looking to get into an argument? You've come to the right place!
Artcraft sells Potassium carbonate in 1lb and 5lb sizes, and they're in New York (state, not city).
I don't remember the hydration amount, but if you adjust the formula as koraks mentioned it'll be exactly the same.
Crawley, BJP Jan 6 1961 p12:
"This use of potassium carbonate (crystalline) as in FX2 deserves comment. Potassium carbonate (cryst) B.P. K2CO3 1 1/2 H2O gives an individual type of alkalinity not matchable with any direct equivalent of potassium carbonate (dried) -as was observed by Dalzell in the twenties; the B.P. crystals must therefore be used in these formulae where specified."
When Crawley formulated the developer, he seemed to think there was a legitimate difference in the hydrate vs. dry form, and said so explicitly, that the 1.5 H20 should not be substituted.
I’m not saying he’s right, but when it comes to developer formulations, I’m one of those people who has to tsee it both ways before I’ll be satisfied.
LP Clerc, Photography Theory and Practice, Vol 4, 1930-1971 section 587:
"Potassium Carbonate is usually obtained in the anhydrous form , K2CO3 , molecular weight = 138, as a white deliquescent powder which should be stored in a well sealed container. It absorbs moisture and carbon dioxide very readily to form the bicarbonate and, unless a specially purified sample is obtained, most specimens contain a considerable proportion of the bicarbonate."
Maybe Crawley considered the crystalline form available in 1960 to be more stable, IDK.
He actually said the reason for using crystal was that he wanted some bicarbonate impurities due to the desirable buffering properties.
I found that the potassium carbonate I purchased, not labelled "dessicated" or "anhydrous" but with printed formula K2CO3 produced a weaker Pyrocat that I expected. I found that the potassium carbonate was apparently somewhat hydrated to some degree by dissolving it and accurately measuring the density and comparing it to a solubility/density graph at engineeringtoolbox. I found that I had to multiply my solution by 1.26.
As far as Crawley's explanation is concerned, it always looked odd. Maybe a dash of bicarbonate would get you close (maybe a slight buffer effect?)
But, alas, I guess I am too new to the forum to have the ability to send a PM.
Yes. I had that thought, and I have some fresh bicarbonate in the cabinet. But where to start? 5 pct? Ten?
All set Dan
The pH of 0.1M sodium carbonate is 11.5 but if just 10% is converted to bicarbonate the pH drops to 10.83:
If potassium carbonate is similar, again the drop in pH would again be around 0.67 units.
IDK, but it reads like it might be photographically significant.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?