Foma can update this paper every day,
Please, don't encourage them.
Is this their paper that doesn't like hardly any safelight lights at all? I had some fogging from one of their 131 papers until I started working almost in the dark. Got some nice prints that way, and a lot of nice kinks too. The paper was quite a bit thinner than the Ilford papers that I had been using previously. Once I learned the hard way about those two things the darkroom work went a lot better.
Today by chance saw a post from Wolfgang Moersch on Flickr in which he mentioned 'new Fomatone 131 semi gloss' paper. I asked him if Foma is about to update its product range, but unfortunately he did not know anything about that. Quite the opposite, he was quite surprised as well.
Is it possible that the 'new' adjective used by Moersch didn't apply to the version of the paper as such, and that this confused you (and then, you managed to confuse him some more)? I ask because I know Moersch is not a native English speaker and I've seen English translations of/by him in the past that were awkward in terms of word order. Which isn't surprising, as the word order when read as a German text made perfect senseSo, TL;DR - could this just be an instance of something being lost in translation?
Most importantly Wolfgang said that this version doesn't Lith.
Der Litheffekt, nämlich die Trennung der tiefen Schatten von den benachbarten Tonwerten, ist weniger ausgeprägt und die Farbigkeit ist erheblich geringer als mit den Chargen zuvor.
That's pretty relevant. Where & when did he say this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?