dickbromberg
Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 8
- Format
- 35mm
I am pretty new to pinhole photography and I need some advice.
I am almost finished putting the camera together.
The length from the pinhole to the film plane is 45 mm I expect to shoot Kodak tmax 100 film. The frame size will be 24 mm high and anything from 24 mm to about 50 mm wide. I included a removable mask so I can shoot wider than normal images.
I used a pinhole calculator ( http://www.mrpinhole.com/calcpinh.php ) and came up with a pinhole size of .283 mm and an f stop of 159 and an exposure time of a half second.
Now that seems to be a problem because how can I reliably expose the film with a manual shutter of a half second.
So I went back to the pinhole calculator and plugged in a couple of other pinhole sizes without changing any of the other parameters and found that if I reduce the pinhole diameter by about ten percent (down to .255 mm) then the exposure time goes up to 1.22 seconds. Using a manually operated shutter Im sure I can approximate 1.22 seconds more accurately than one half of a second.
So the question comes down to the following:
Should I use an undersized pinhole diameter and a better approximation of the exposure time or should I use the correct pinhole diameter and a poorer approximation of the exposure time???
I understand that I could insert a neutral density filter inside the camera to extend the exposure time but Id like to avoid that if possible.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Dick Bromberg
I am almost finished putting the camera together.
The length from the pinhole to the film plane is 45 mm I expect to shoot Kodak tmax 100 film. The frame size will be 24 mm high and anything from 24 mm to about 50 mm wide. I included a removable mask so I can shoot wider than normal images.
I used a pinhole calculator ( http://www.mrpinhole.com/calcpinh.php ) and came up with a pinhole size of .283 mm and an f stop of 159 and an exposure time of a half second.
Now that seems to be a problem because how can I reliably expose the film with a manual shutter of a half second.
So I went back to the pinhole calculator and plugged in a couple of other pinhole sizes without changing any of the other parameters and found that if I reduce the pinhole diameter by about ten percent (down to .255 mm) then the exposure time goes up to 1.22 seconds. Using a manually operated shutter Im sure I can approximate 1.22 seconds more accurately than one half of a second.
So the question comes down to the following:
Should I use an undersized pinhole diameter and a better approximation of the exposure time or should I use the correct pinhole diameter and a poorer approximation of the exposure time???
I understand that I could insert a neutral density filter inside the camera to extend the exposure time but Id like to avoid that if possible.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Dick Bromberg