Under/over the lens MG filter testing

Flow of thoughts

D
Flow of thoughts

  • 2
  • 0
  • 40
Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 5
  • 2
  • 57
Plague

D
Plague

  • 0
  • 0
  • 48
Vinsey

A
Vinsey

  • 3
  • 1
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,158
Messages
2,787,239
Members
99,827
Latest member
HKlongzzgg
Recent bookmarks
0

tkamiya

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
I had an unfortunate incident that damaged under-the-lens multi-grade filter. That is, I accidentally hit the top of film cleaner spray and spritzed some of the stuff on filter. That resulted in partial damage to the surface.

Now I have a replacement.

THAT allows me to do some testing on the effects of under-the-lens MG contrast filters!

I always wondered how much, if any, degradation there is to have under-the-lens filters. I hear there is none. Then next question is, how much damage is too much. These filters are so easy to damage and hard to clean.... There has to be a limit where impact is negligible and tolerable.

My idea is this.... Have some kind of reference negative and print set the enlarger head high to simulate high magnification printing. I'll use 5x7 paper to cut down on a cost. (will be printing just a part of the image)

Then...

1) print with no filter - reference #1
2) print with over the film filter (undamaged) - reference #2
3) print with under the lens filter (undamaged) - reference #3

4) print with under the lens filter (already damaged by spray)
5) print with under the lens filter (scratch some with sand paper)
6) print with under the lens filter (severely scratch with sand paper)


Would this test procedure sound reasonable? What kind of subject will make good test negative? I'm thinking something high contrast with sharp lines.
 
OP
OP

tkamiya

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
well... I don't know about that. Even a brand new filters aren't blemishness. I see some light scratches and pitting new out of box. All of mine are clean but not perfect either. So my interest really is, how bad does it have to be before it shows up in prints. My hope is that it will have to be "pretty bad" before it has some impact.

I'll probably do 8x10 prints as on smaller ones, anything will look good and prints are best evaluated as whole.

Anyway, I'll do this shortly and post back the result.
 

Sim2

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
492
Location
Wiltshire UK
Format
Medium Format
Nice opportunity for a useful test there. Interested in hearing your results.

As an additional thought, what about if the filter is not exactly parallel to the neg, does that have a visible effect? Not expecting this to be tested but merely float the idea ion your direction :whistling:

All the best for the testing.
 
OP
OP

tkamiya

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
I'll print one with clean filter tilted 45 degrees.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,223
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I'll print one with clean filter tilted 45 degrees.

Is there anything beside your enlarger that flare might reflect off of? If there is, this "45 degree" test might interact with that.
 
OP
OP

tkamiya

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
Good point. Yes. I will place a black board to prevent that.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom