U/V Filters No Longer Needed (?)

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 10
  • 5
  • 105
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 97
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 6
  • 0
  • 107
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 11
  • 1
  • 131

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,847
Messages
2,781,794
Members
99,728
Latest member
rohitmodi
Recent bookmarks
0

18%gray

Hello --

I'm a new member of this site, interested mostly in color landscape photography with MF equipment, though I do other things and with other formats as well.

I ran across this quote in a book by a well-known landscape photographer, and thought I'd like to get comments from some folks here:

“Many books advise that you use a UV filter . . . this precaution is no longer necessary. Most modern films have a UV absorbing layer to prevent the blue colour casts . . .”

John Hedgecoe
“Landscape Photography”
1994

Is this really true? If it is true of "most" modern films, is there a list of those that do not have the UV absorbing layer? If it's only true of some, is there a list of those that do have it?

Landscape work can involve juggling a number of filters under difficult circumstances and if I can eliminate one from the bunch it would be a help, but I'd like to know the truth of the matter before making a decision about whether to leave the UV filter off or not.

I'd appreciate any comments that members may care to make.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom