• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Trying to decide on FD Lenses

Living happily with my FD 24mm f2.8 SSC and my FD 85mm f1.2L. 1 for wide group and landscape, the other for some range and outdoor close-up portrait.
 
Trying to decide which 50 to keep....

Any reason to choose the 50 SSC over the FDn? I could keep both, but I don't really NEED both. Just like I don't really NEED the 35-105
 
Trying to decide which 50 to keep....

Any reason to choose the 50 SSC over the FDn? I could keep both, but I don't really NEED both. Just like I don't really NEED the 35-105
Why not keep both with one as a backup just in case something happens? With the way prices for FD lenses(and most manual focus lenses) going up because of m4/3 cameras, you might end having to pay more in the future.
 
Aw shucks.. Good point!

I didn't take much convincing did it! Haha.

BTW - I'd be interested in trading my 35-105 for a 24 f/2.8 (either version) if anyone is interested. (I've even got the hood for it!)
 
300mm f/4L is good but really not that much better than the 300mm f/4 version.

Just picked up the FD 300mm f/4L about a month ago and have been testing it against my non-L. I gotta say, the L is MUCH better in contrast, saturation and sharpness until at least f/8.

OK, this thread can return to its grave.