Trying to decide on FD Lenses

wootsk

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
34
Location
Singapore
Format
Large Format
Living happily with my FD 24mm f2.8 SSC and my FD 85mm f1.2L. 1 for wide group and landscape, the other for some range and outdoor close-up portrait.
 
OP
OP

agphotography

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
659
Location
Orange County
Format
Multi Format
Trying to decide which 50 to keep....

Any reason to choose the 50 SSC over the FDn? I could keep both, but I don't really NEED both. Just like I don't really NEED the 35-105
 

CD55

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
110
Location
SF Bay Area,
Format
Multi Format
Trying to decide which 50 to keep....

Any reason to choose the 50 SSC over the FDn? I could keep both, but I don't really NEED both. Just like I don't really NEED the 35-105
Why not keep both with one as a backup just in case something happens? With the way prices for FD lenses(and most manual focus lenses) going up because of m4/3 cameras, you might end having to pay more in the future.
 
OP
OP

agphotography

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
659
Location
Orange County
Format
Multi Format
Aw shucks.. Good point!

I didn't take much convincing did it! Haha.

BTW - I'd be interested in trading my 35-105 for a 24 f/2.8 (either version) if anyone is interested. (I've even got the hood for it!)
 

Tony-S

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
1,144
Location
Colorado, USA
Format
Multi Format
300mm f/4L is good but really not that much better than the 300mm f/4 version.

Just picked up the FD 300mm f/4L about a month ago and have been testing it against my non-L. I gotta say, the L is MUCH better in contrast, saturation and sharpness until at least f/8.

OK, this thread can return to its grave.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…