Just a heads up from a moderator's perspective - I can see this thread going off track easily, so if it should be locked and/or removed after consideration by the moderation team because of problems that arise, please do not take that personally.
From a personal perspective ...
I spent a majority of my working life helping many people deal with problems. And in many cases, those problems arose because of the actions of others.
I totally understand an unwillingness to extend trust if someone has had their trust abused in the past, or has witnessed the ramifications of others having their trust abused in the past.
And I also understand why someone unfamiliar with you might not feel confident enough to extend trust, because of that lack of knowledge about you.
Those of us who have spent a lot of time here, over a long period of time, have all sorts of indirect experience with many people here, without ever actually meeting them. Not everyone has the benefit of that experience.
I believe I noticed the communication you referenced.
And when I did, I thought that it was both unfortunate that the person felt the need to ask what they did, and generally unfortunate that it was probably a good thing to ask of someone you weren't familiar with, but intended to transact business with.
I expect that if you asked a police officer who was involved with internet based transaction fraud, they would support that request as being a safe and prudent thing to do. And safe and prudent often can appear cynical and skeptical.
And back to the moderator's perspective - we would generally caution those who buy and sell things through contacts that arose here to proceed with care and caution. It is often a harsh world out there.
It's about ethics and phiosophy but it's not photography and it's about trust. I did quite a few of sales and giving away and getting free stuff from other photrio members. It works out very well when we trust eachother. We just send the item and the money we don't need the other to prove anything. We don't need to receive payment first. We don't need to use paypal. The process is much quicker and save us fee. The fee is what we have to pay when we don't trust eachother.
I was about to sell a thermometer for someone and I did post a picture of the thermometer and I accept the first offer the person made. I also the price was very reasonable. However, the person wanted me to post another picture with hand written note with the date to prove that I have it. I feel offended and I also think how can I trust the person if he doesn't trust me.
However, I would like to thanks member Rick A. who sent me his camera and lens before he receive my payment so I get it quickly. Thank you.
Thank you, Matt. I agree re: the lines between safe and prudent, and cynical and skeptical can be blurred. I maintain that in this day and age, a little bit of cynicism can go a long way. I was absolutely nothing but polite and forthcoming with my intentions.
You should probably also understand then that, for whatever reason, when I saw your request it was the first time I had seen it made here on Photrio (and its predecessor, APUG) in the 19 years I have been around.
I too found it slightly jarring, even while thinking it prudent, appropriate and maybe even wise.
It's about ethics and phiosophy but it's not photography and it's about trust. I did quite a few of sales and giving away and getting free stuff from other photrio members. It works out very well when we trust eachother. We just send the item and the money we don't need the other to prove anything. We don't need to receive payment first. We don't need to use paypal. The process is much quicker and save us fee. The fee is what we have to pay when we don't trust eachother.
I was about to sell a thermometer for someone and I did post a picture of the thermometer and I accept the first offer the person made. I also the price was very reasonable. However, the person wanted me to post another picture with hand written note with the date to prove that I have it. I feel offended and I also think how can I trust the person if he doesn't trust me.
However, I would like to thanks member Rick A. who sent me his camera and lens before he receive my payment so I get it quickly. Thank you.
In the other marketplaces I frequent it is a very common practice, and like I said, even mandatory in some cases. In the matter of a financial transaction, prudence and wisdom - and safety - will take precedence over feelings any day of the week, in my opinion.
All of which highlights another thing that we say regularly here.
People should move discussions about the details of their transactions to a Private Conversation, instead of discussing same in the public forums.
And they should take the opportunity to make clear exactly what each expects of the other.
The visible-to-all nature of the forums serves as a disincentive to that clarity.
If either the buyer or the seller cannot get on the same trust level, then it is probably best if they stop dealing with each other.
I have suggested that the seller I am talking to receive and cash my check and then the check clears before they send me the item.
I use PayPal and not PayPal friends and family because I want an avenue of recourse it something goes wrong. You may feel differently, but could you accept that for a transaction?
I don't think it's unreasonable to want someone to prove they have an item before it's paid for. It is too simple for someone to be scammed when dealing online. Business is business and it is best to try and keep emotions out of the transactions.
If I want to scam you I can prove to you that I have a lot of stuff to sell but what if I simply don't send it? Of course you are going to get a refund whether I don't have the item or have it but don't send it. What's the difference?
While I prefer not to use Paypal but if someone insist I do understand as well as using Paypal as a transaction for good and service I do understand that. What I don't understand that the person think it's possible that I try to sell something I don't own and posting an image that I stole from somewhere. If I do have the item but I don't send it what the difference.
While I prefer not to use Paypal but if someone insist I do understand as well as using Paypal as a transaction for good and service I do understand that. What I don't understand that the person think it's possible that I try to sell something I don't own and posting an image that I stole from somewhere. If I do have the item but I don't send it what the difference.
Yeah, absolutely a possibility.If I want to scam you I can prove to you that I have a lot of stuff to sell but what if I simply don't send it? Of course you are going to get a refund whether I don't have the item or have it but don't send it. What's the difference?
If you don't trust the other you can never be sure. What if I send you a good item but then after receiving it you send me a picture of something else and claim that I send the bad item.
Yeah, absolutely a possibility.
Answer me this Batman..............what was the price of the thermometer.?
thank you
A lot of scams are based on photos of items that the “seller” doesn’t actually have. By asking for proof that the item in question is in fact in the seller’s possession, you significantly reduce the risk of getting scammed.If I want to scam you I can prove to you that I have a lot of stuff to sell but what if I simply don't send it? Of course you are going to get a refund whether I don't have the item or have it but don't send it. What's the difference?
If you don't trust the other you can never be sure. What if I send you a good item but then after receiving it you send me a picture of something else and claim that I send the bad item.
A lot of scams are based on photos of items that the “seller” doesn’t actually have. By asking for proof that the item in question is in fact in the seller’s possession, you significantly reduce the risk of getting scammed.
There’s this guitar forum I used to frequent. A while back a very well known and respected member suddenly started scamming people by selling stuff he didn’t actually have. It turned out his account had been high jacked, and was being used for shady business based on the trust the member had built for almost a decade. We can’t always know that the person behind the account is the person that usually is behind the account. If that makes sense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?