Tried the Taco method. It didn't go well. What's the best 3x4 dev tank (that doesn't use 1+ liters of chems)?

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,024
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
So, I tried the taco method. It failed spectacularly.

I was super worried that it was going to be a complete disaster, but thankfully, it turned out alright:

Anyway, I’m looking for an actual 3x4 tank so that I can develop sheets without fear that this mess will happen again. Any suggestions?

FYI, actual film dimensions are 81x106mm if that helps.
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,779
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Old 3x4 sheet film hangers can be had cheaply on Ebay, but you'd have to find/fabricate at least 3 tanks and process in the dark.


Just be sure the tanks hold the minimum required developer amount, which I think is around 250-300 ML per sheet and use them one-shot.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,258
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
Of course the Yankee tank is adjustable for 3 1/4 x 4 1/4, but as you noted it uses a lot of chemistry. Two options there are HC110 or L110 at 1:63 which is pretty economical or a replenished developer - I have used both approaches. I know there is little love for the Yankee tank, but I have used it off and on for more than 50 years. Originally got it in the ‘60’s because I needed a daylight tank for my Baby Speed Graphic’s 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 sheets. I think new they are $40 or so.
More economical with developer is the Combi Plan tank. I got one in a darkroom lot and quite like it for 4x5, I noticed it is adjustable for your quarter plate film as well. I see them on the used market for $80 or so, they stopped producing them awhile ago.
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,437
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format
The Nikkor sheet film tank uses less chemistry than the Yankee Agitank. But it takes some funky movements to avoid agitation marks. I find the Yankee tank gives the best development. I usually use Rodinal 1:50 so the chemistry volume isn’t a big deal.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,459
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
Shooting 4x5 sheet film in an old Speed Graphic 55 years ago, on the high school newspaper photography staff I learned the easy use of tray processing of sheet film...you merely need to use the minimum quantity of fluid with processing capacity for the number of sheets in the tray, working in the dark.
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,024
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
I like this tank, seems like it is just what I need! Unfortunately the only one I can find for sale right now is broken, and being sold by CatLabs, so even if it was fully working I wouldn’t buy it from them.

Thought about this, and I do have a darkroom, so I could do that. I would just be extremely nervous about working with chemicals in complete darkness. It’s one thing to work with dry film in the dark, it’s very much another to work with large amounts of liquids. Maybe if nothing else works out, I’ll give that a shot.
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,436
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
I don't know the 3x4 tank answer - I think Nikor 4x5 reels are adjustable for height. Smaller/tighter hairbands might help with the taco method. Also, it looks like your film clips are clamping the film well inside the image area when hanging. Try clipping on a corner with the perfs, and just kissing the corner of the film.
 

P C Headland

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
824
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format

I'd suggest this too, but would note that they are easier to find in the UK / Europe than in the US.

I use mine for 4x5"and 9x12cm sheet film. I laid down some thin lines of epoxy to stop the film sticking to the base. I generally use 150ml of solution, though have tried with less when developing a single sheet.
 

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,542
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format

Good point. There was something nagging at the back of my mind about something else I'd seen and came up with this

https://www.freestylephoto.com/4458...ing-Tray-for-8x10,-5x7,-4x10,-4x5,-and-9x12cm

which is available in the USA. It depends if it can be adapted for the size of film, but my guess would be it can, just putting the film into the 4x5 spaces. But Stearman should be able to confirm this.
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,779
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Stearman also makes the 445 and 645 tanks with removable film holders that can be modified for 9x12 cm (as per their instructions). I don't see why they can't be modified for 3.25 x 4.25 film as well...

 

grahamp

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
1,716
Location
Vallejo (SF Bay Area)
Format
Multi Format
I have a 3D printed reel that does 2x3. I scaled it down from a Thingiverse design to run in a Jobo 1520 tank. There are issues doing this, as the 2x3 film does not like bending, and there seems to be some over development on the edges. My test film is old, so I need to try it with fresher film. Even rotary, that is 6 sheets in the same chemicals as two 8 frame rolls of 120 on a 120 reel. But shooting 2x3 is not cheap unless you are cutting down 4x5.

Still a work in progress.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,598
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
You don't need lots of liquid volume. I process 4x5 film, up to six at a time, in trays using 500ml of solution in each tray. After the film has been in the fixer for half the fixing time, you can turn on the lights.

There is a bit of a learning curve to tray processing, but once mastered, it's really the most flexible and economical of all the methods I know.

You need to realize that you will slop some chemistry out of the tray. The processing trays need to be in larger trays or a sink (or both). That said, I tray-processed on the countertop of my Vienna bathroom for years. I covered the countertop with a plastic bag over which I spread a few overlapping kitchen towels (used only for the darkroom since they got stained with pyro). Worked just fine.

I'd recommend practicing shuffling scrap sheets (you can use old negatives you don't want to print) in a tray of water with the lights on to start with. Then practice with eyes closed, then with the lights out.

There's a lot of info here and over at the LF forums about tray processing techniques. Do a search or two.

Best,

Doremus
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,459
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format

Pour the processing solutions into trays in the light.
Practice with dummy sheetfilm (even already-processed films) in the light, using only water in the trays
  1. sliding films quickly one after another into the tray,
  2. pulling sheet from bottom and placing back on top of the stack by sliding back into the solution,
  3. feeling where the tray edge is for the next tray a
  4. nd tranferring films from one tray to the other
...once you do that, it becomes ingrained in muscle memory and easy to do in the dark. You then add an audible timer that you start after all films are immersed in developer, and wait for it to ring and mark when you transfer sheet by sheet to the next solution.

Remember to keep in mind not scratching the wet emulsions with the base layer!
 
Last edited:

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,415
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

I found that the Yankee tanks splashed a lot of the chemicals out. Other tanks are better. I have no recommendation for 3 1/4" x 4 1/4" tanks, only 4"x5" tanks.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,258
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
I found that the Yankee tanks splashed a lot of the chemicals out. Other tanks are better. I have no recommendation for 3 1/4" x 4 1/4" tanks, only 4"x5" tanks.

I have often read that the Yankee tank splashes chemistry. I have never experienced that problem. I guess I am just more gentle in my agitation than many others. I have not had issues with uneven development. Donald Qualls seems to like his as well.
Hey, to each his own!
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,437
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format

If you follow the instructions you won’t splash, I’m guessing that you did read the instructions.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
My vote is for a Jobo 2500 series tank and the sheet film reel - you can do 6 sheets per reel, and use a very minimal amount of chemistry if you use a rotary base (to keep it cheap, Jobo makes an adjustable length roller base for manual processing, or you could make your own with a set of furniture wheels and a piece of plywood). I LOATHE the Yankee Tank- I have never been able to get good results out of one - I always get developer surge along the edges of the negative where the rack holds the film.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,415
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Jobo Expert Drums provide flexibility with reliable consistent processing.
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,024
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
That was my thought, 4x5 tubes should work fine with 3x4. The View Camera Store has some good videos on YouTube on how to use them. You can buy tubes or make them. Very economical on chemistry.

Roger
Can I make them from PVC pipes from the hardware store? Or do they need to be made in a special way?

Jobo Expert Drums provide flexibility with reliable consistent processing.

Unfortunately, they also blow up my wallet.
 

Roger Thoms

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
1,781
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Format
8x10 Format
Can I make them from PVC pipes from the hardware store? Or do they need to be made in a special way?



Unfortunately, they also blow up my wallet.

I used grey pvc electrical conduit and abs couplers and caps for the 5x7 tubes I made. I’m traveling, but will post a few photos when I get home on Thursday.

Roger

Lol, have photos on my phone already.
 

Attachments

  • 97B9648A-B8AD-4134-9F7B-6B2C27FE75AE.jpeg
    342.6 KB · Views: 86
  • 88FA8F14-D709-455B-AC4D-4E28276255E3.jpeg
    290 KB · Views: 73
  • 9C516D38-564E-4BA8-8081-F0E2113D5D06.jpeg
    317.4 KB · Views: 80

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,415
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Unfortunately, they also blow up my wallet.

But over time, having consistently good sheet film development will spread the cost. Besides your photographs are worth it and you deserve to have every sheet of film developed correctly.
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,024
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
At the moment I’m saving up to buy a 90mm for my RB, but maybe my next big purchase will be a JOBO tank.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…