Tribute - John Gorman's vintage San Francisco

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,759
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
I wonder why owners removed those fender skirts?

Probably post-war design changes heavily dated large fender skirts and owners took them off to "modernize" the car a bit. The Classic Packard Roadster design was solidly in the 1920's and wasn't changed much until well after WWII.

To me, that's what makes it so attractive, but people do what they do...
 
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
For those who remember Post #111 with the photographer's studio and art deco columns, the buildings are alive and well at 330 West Portal Ave. in S.F. (Dimitra's now) The columns are painted over making them barely recognizable as the pretty art deco they once were, but the apartment building looks in pretty good shape!
 

Attachments

  • 330WPortal2.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 43
  • 4-244-sm-photog.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 41
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
I think this is the Carquinez Bridge, East Bay. If any Bay Area native knows for sure, please say so. Even though I grew up in S.F., I didn't spend much time going east. And it's too many cars to i.d.!
 

Attachments

  • cars.jpg
    127.4 KB · Views: 40

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,866
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format

Hey, thanks for the detective work! There's hope still for the columns if someone figures out how to remove the horrible shiny blue paint. The main thing is that so far, people have at least been awake enough to preserve this piece of architecture - cool!
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,759
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format

Unfortunately, in the USA that is often the fate of surviving architecture; slap a coat of paint on it and call it good. I cringe every time I see a grand, brick facade slathered with some cheap paint, which dooms it to eventual efflorescence and destruction...
 
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
I don't think it is the Carquinez - the old bridge was a single span, and the grade is about the same at each end. The current Carquinez bridge is two spans, and both are post 2000.


Re: Post #128 -- I finally got it figured out (took a lot of digging). There was one Carquinez Bridge built in 1927. Then another identical looking bridge was built next to it in 1958. The Loma Prieta earthquake (1989) caused some structural damage to them. The 1958 bridge was retrofitted; they built the more modern Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge next to them; in 2006-2007 they dismantled the 1927 bridge that was between them. So the photo my dad took in the 1940s was the original, single bridge that was torn down. It was hard to find another photo of that steep, sharp angle coming off the bridge because everything was rebuilt differently including that off ramp. So my dad’s photo is more historical than I thought!
 

Attachments

  • OldBridge.jpg
    655.4 KB · Views: 28
  • cars.jpg
    127.4 KB · Views: 29

grahamp

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
1,706
Location
Vallejo (SF Bay Area)
Format
Multi Format
Ah! I was around for the 2006-2007 reconstruction, but was not for the re-routing of the southern bridge run. The oldbridge.jpg image makes it all clear.

There's a bit of an irony here - my brother in law had his house in Crockett purchased by the State to allow for some of the newer Interstate 80 access after the Alfred Zampa span was put up.

Traffic level has not changed much!
 
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
This just cracks me up. I think these guys made this picture as a joke, but I'm not sure what the joke is. They just look funny trying to figure out.... what?
 

Attachments

  • CameraFix3.jpg
    920.3 KB · Views: 41

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,866
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
This just cracks me up. I think these guys made this picture as a joke, but I'm not sure what the joke is. They just look funny trying to figure out.... what?
That's a photo of the participants of the Photrio forum during a workshop. We're still pretty much at the same point 70 years ahead.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,741
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
That's definitely a bizarre one. An attempt at photography slapstick.
 
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
Errr...that was a joke, right? I assume that photo doesn't require an explanation. I mean..c'mon...does it

I keep wondering who's idea it was to take this photo. My dad is one of the characters in it. Believe me, he had a super sense of humor and likely had something to do with the idea. Then again, they could have really been trying to figure something out with the camera and someone snapped the picture because it looked hilarious. Unfortunately, we will never know. But it's a fun "photographer's photo" for sure.
 

qqphot

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
220
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Format
35mm RF

Even today in San Francisco it's a $65 fine for failing to curb your wheels on an incline of greater than 3%.
 
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
Even today in San Francisco it's a $65 fine for failing to curb your wheels on an incline of greater than 3%.

I'm wondering if in the old days people curbed their wheels because it was common sense and good practice or if there was a fine for not doing so. I don't remember! For me it would have been every time I parked because I would have no idea what a 3% incline would be!
 
OP
OP

Nancy123

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
149
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Format
35mm
It must be something about the small object in front of the camera.

So, it's a pencil with something stuck on the tip. It's possible there really was a focusing problem. I'm going with the theory that the problem was real and someone thought it was a funny scene, perhaps even exaggerated for comic effect.
 

Attachments

  • closeup.jpg
    671.2 KB · Views: 16

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,866
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Holding an object that small, so close to the lens, with limited extension, and nobody looking at the ground glass? Come on, people.

It's a joke. And this joke is on the likes of us - with good reason. We should put this picture at the top of every thread on stop bath, the proper use of wetting agent, the size of brain in relation to development time, stand development and a great number of similar topics. That's is what this is about. And your father, Nancy, understood it perfectly well. I'd wager to say his ability to self-reflect far exceeded that of the average participant in photo forums today.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…