• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Tri-X woes

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,084
Messages
2,834,874
Members
101,105
Latest member
admirall
Recent bookmarks
0

mesh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
313
Location
Adelois
Format
8x10 Format
I've just souped up three rolls of Tri-x in 35mm and 95% of the frames are extremely flat and around a stop under-exposed. I used my standard times with XTOL 1:1 @ 9 min. Everything as per normal... camera is fine, metered with a handheld which is accurate. I also shot many rolls of Portra using the same camera which came out fine. Only 'new' thing was a light yellow B+W filter so I exposed everything @200. My only conclusion is that my XTOL has expired.. it was just a little flakey so that should have warned me I guess. Its been stored properly at full strength for about 6 months. Could expired developer explain very flat negs? I don;t think I'll even try and print these... lessons learned! ;-) Any advice appreciated. Thank you.
 

chriscrawfordphoto

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
1,893
Location
Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Format
Medium Format
6 months is about the end of life for Xtol so you might have had expired chemicals. I think the filter you used needs 1.5 stops extra exposure too, so that compounds it.
 
OP
OP
mesh

mesh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
313
Location
Adelois
Format
8x10 Format
Thanks very much Chris. I thought light yellow was only 2/3 of a stop... silly me. Thanks for your help. I will make up another 5L batch now and get rid of the old XTOL!
 

kreeger

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
207
Location
Missouri
Format
Multi Format
Kodak tells you what the alkaline ph should be of the stock solution. On eBay, you can buy an inexpensive PH meter and measure the strength of your developer when it's fresh. You check the ph before you use it and that way you know for sure and avoid less than potent development in the future.
 
OP
OP
mesh

mesh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
313
Location
Adelois
Format
8x10 Format
Thanks kreeger - I'll check that out. A worthwhile investment.
 

mdarnton

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
463
Location
Chicago
Format
35mm RF
Simple thing to remember: if the edge printing on the film look like it usually does, the problem is you and your filter, or your camera. If it's light and flat like your negs, the problem is your developer.
 

Sundowner

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
507
Location
Virgo Supercluster
Format
Multi Format
I've found Tri-X to be developer sensitive, although I use HC-110 and Diafine, mostly. Using a water bath beforehand has helped me with more even development, but I notice that when I get to the last couple few drops of oxidized HC-110, the negatives are a bit more flat. I tend to just dispose of my chemicals if they're questionable.

Good advice on the edge printing! Thanks!
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,770
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
I think your problem has been answered. I just want to add that storing the full strength developer in full amber glass bottles or other light blocking bottles is best. Fill to the top to keep exposure to air at the very minimum. Some use marbles but I found that to be a nuisance. I got some brown bottles from a pharmacist a number of years ago. The have measurements and are easy to clean and have been faithful for over twenty years.

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom