Tri-X in Rodinal..Stand Development

part 2

A
part 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 74
Sonatas XII-32 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-32 (Homes)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 123
Thirsty

D
Thirsty

  • 4
  • 0
  • 1K
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 3
  • 0
  • 1K
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 8
  • 3
  • 2K

Forum statistics

Threads
199,391
Messages
2,790,913
Members
99,890
Latest member
moenich
Recent bookmarks
0

Mike Kennedy

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
1,594
Location
Eastern Cana
Format
Multi Format
I just tried Donald Qualls recommendation for tri-x in rodinal (50:1, 17 minutes, agitate at 5 minute intervals, 20o c). If I was to change the ratio to 100:1 does it follow that I would develop for 34 minutes?

Thanks,
Mike
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
1,355
Location
Downers Grov
Usually 1.4 times the original time if you cut the concentration by half.

Tried stand development for the first time last weekend. Used RO9 from J&C at 2ml per 8 oz. Inverted 5 times at the start and 5 at twenty min. Total time was 45 min at 66 deg F. These print on a condenser enlarger and #2 paper just right.

I neglected to mention the film was Tri x.
 

NikoSperi

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
575
Location
Italy
Format
Multi Format
Ronald Moravec said:
Usually 1.4 times the original time if you cut the concentration by half.
Really? I was under the Covington-inspired impression that twice the dilution = twice the time... or is that ANOTHER thing I've been getting wrong :rolleyes:
Edit: Yep, checked on his site about HC110 where he does say, "Try the unofficial dilution H which is half of dilution B, and simply develop twice as long as for dilution B"... has worked for me.
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,072
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
High dilutions that's the key
digitaltruth lists these times for PluX
Rodinal 1+25 = 6 min
Rodinal 1+50 = 13 min
that is 2X +

Back to TriX Rodinal:
If you are going to try Roidnal 1+100, then try 40 minutes
Since the developer is so diluted and you are useing stand or semistand then the higlights will not blow and the shadows will have some detail.
 

thefizz

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
2,345
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
Grain on a 10x8 print from TriX in rodinal 1:50 is not bad at all.
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Tri-X in Rodinal, semi-stand, has very pleasant grain up through pushing to 12,800...which is as high as I've seen. Haven't seen prints, though...only scans. If only I could get my hands on the prints.
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Just to note, what I was talking about above was on 35mm. Tri-X in Rodinal, 1:50 for 51 minutes. Constant agitation for the first minute and then five inversions every five minutes thereafter. I couldn't believe my eyes...so I'm doing it myself. Heh.
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,072
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
I thouight the grain was nice.
I shot a few rolls, and got old-time-looking pictures with grain that actually added to the picture

Maybe just me that think fine grain is overrated


zenrhino said:
Wouldn't tri-x in rodinal be really grainy?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom