herb
Subscriber
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 405
- Format
- Medium Format
Being back in LF for about a year after 40 years, I am at the beginning of my learning curve, and have settled on Pyrocat HD for a developer. Film is a different thing.
Developing was in ss tanks, 4000ml of solution, 5x7 film in ss hangers.
I shot the same scene this weekend with Tri X and HP5 Ilford, developed six negative of each in pyrocat HD 2:3:100 semi stand with 60 sec lift and tilt agitation 12 min stand, lift and tilt 3 times for two additional 12 min periods, so a total of 36 min stand with agitation every 12 min.
I used the mfg asa rating, 320 and 400 and got amazing differences. The tri x was much more developed and stained than the HP5, to the point that half of the HP5 negs were too thin to seriously consider using, and two of the tri x negs were too dark to really consider printing.
Any ideas about what is going on here? I am getting some new Ilford film,
perhaps since this is two years out of date, although frozen most of that time, it may be the culprit.
Any wisdom would be appreciated
Developing was in ss tanks, 4000ml of solution, 5x7 film in ss hangers.
I shot the same scene this weekend with Tri X and HP5 Ilford, developed six negative of each in pyrocat HD 2:3:100 semi stand with 60 sec lift and tilt agitation 12 min stand, lift and tilt 3 times for two additional 12 min periods, so a total of 36 min stand with agitation every 12 min.
I used the mfg asa rating, 320 and 400 and got amazing differences. The tri x was much more developed and stained than the HP5, to the point that half of the HP5 negs were too thin to seriously consider using, and two of the tri x negs were too dark to really consider printing.
Any ideas about what is going on here? I am getting some new Ilford film,
perhaps since this is two years out of date, although frozen most of that time, it may be the culprit.
Any wisdom would be appreciated