As a MF RF user, there aren't interchangeable backs so I never got to rely on that feature. If you just shoot B&W mainly I think it will be simple enough without changing film.
I tend to be hesitant about shooting 400 speed film in daylight, but that is mostly because where I live the sun is intense, and most days are completely cloudless. On a leaf shutter SLR 1/500 is my max, and that it doesn't really reach (I came across a magazine review of the Bronica SQ where they tested the shutter speeds on a brand new lens. It was pretty accurate up to 1/250, but 1/500 was only halfway between 250 and 500 on a brand new lens, so I don't usually use 1/500.) ISO400 means ƒ22 and 1/250 on sunny days, whereas TMAX100 could do ƒ11. But yes if I only do B&W the swappable backs become less critical, but I can still imagine I'd have all 3 B&W film types loaded and swap out between 100, 400, 3200 based on the context.
I could easily fit a 4th back for something color like Pro400H, but my thoughts (and kind of the gist of this thread..at least its initial purpose) are less about technical solutions but rather about simplifying my thought processes...it is my vacation afterall. I mentioned this is a previous post that the rule could be simple--indoors or heavy clouds: Tri-X; Outside: TMX100; In the sewers (or night time or other dark interiors) Delta3200.
On the positive side, lack of color film means I don't have to ask myself--"do I want this shot in color or black and white?" On the negative side (and my primary concern) not having color film means if the answer had been "shoot color" that is no longer an option.
Although i usually travel with both 100 & 400 iso film, certainly in medium format I could travel with 400. The max daylight situations i overcome by carrying yellow and orange filters.
yeah, I should have thought of that. All the ETR lenses I'll be bringing will have a 62mm filter thread. Unfortuntely the only contrast filters I have are square. I have a 62mm adapter for the square filters, but the attachment is bulky, and switching the setup from lens to lens would be a pain. So I ordered a yellow #15 and an orange #21 from Amazon. We'll see if the get here before I leave.
Voting again for the filter. Maybe you are even able to get a second hand screw in in time.I tend to be hesitant about shooting 400 speed film in daylight, but that is mostly because where I live the sun is intense, and most days are completely cloudless.
On the positive side, lack of color film means I don't have to ask myself--"do I want this shot in color or black and white?" On the negative side (and my primary concern) not having color film means if the answer had been "shoot color" that is no longer an option.
My beloved machine, now for "film economy" would like the 6x8 instead of 6x9.grabbed my Fuji GW680lll....Tri-X/Orange filter....
Of course, shooting 645 the difference between 100/400 film characteristics would be more visible than in 6x7+
I traveled a lot with Fuji GA645zi. It is one of the best travel cameras! I used it for 20 years & but recently sold it to minimise the cameras choiceThe interesting thing is I bought the GA645Zi specifically to simplify travel shooting--zoom lens covers a wide and standard prime, auto exposure simplifies the process. But I haven't really used it as a travel camera because I've really found the MF SLR interchangable backs hard to give up. I keep thinking I'll want to change film. Admittedly I also don't entirely trust the camera. The LCD does work, though it flickers if I open the back too far, so I know its dying, but when the back is close it fine. The issue I have with it is when loading the film there is a dial you turn to advance the film--each click rolls forward about a centimeter. But the rotary encoder on the camera is a bit flaky and on occasion I move it forward a single click and it advances way too far and way overshoots the start arrow. I'm thinking of bringing the Fuji and leaving it in the hotel most of the time, but picking a day or two, and leave the Bronica in the hotel and only go out with the Fuji and see how it does.
On the other hand, I've seen discussions from people on the MF forum here say that the changable backs on MF SLR isn't really worthwhile unless you're shooting wedding, but to me that one of the greatest conveniences of MF (I know Rollie made some 35mm cameras with interchangeable backs but they are a bit pricey. Even the 135N back for the Bronica has gotten expensive, but nowhere near the cost of a 135W back.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?