Tough / mudproof camera

Joined
Jun 1, 2017
Messages
33
Location
Moscow - Warsaw
Format
Multi Format
(post updated after the helpful comments I've received)

Hi everyone,

I'm looking for a 35mm camera that can be used in tough conditions such as winter mountaineering, hiking in rain, plodding in mud or boating in the ocean.
A film GoPro of sorts (forgive me mentioning anything d**ital

Criteria:

  • Available online, not a rare and unusual bird
  • Inexpensive (as it can be destroyed during my adventures)
  • Doesn't have to be 100% waterproof (i.e. for swimming/diving), but should be able to continue working after being soaked in rain for the whole day (maybe with simple wiping or drying), so no or minimal amount of electronics
  • Reasonably tough built (i.e. can survive falls from a couple of feet or abuse such as being banged on the rocks while walking / climbing)
  • ...Does not have to be metered, judging from the comments. I think I can deal with Sunny16 and a wide-latitude colour neg film
  • Reasonably compact to use with one hand or to haul up a mountain clipped to a harness

What would you recommend?..

Cheers,
Alexander
 
Last edited:

Nige

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
2,316
Format
Multi Format
I have a Nikon ActionTouch (L35 AW). Waterproof with 35/2.8 lens. Never bounced mine off rocks so no idea if really tough, seems solid. No idea how cheap though. There were Minolta Weathermatics and Canon SureShots
 

AndyH

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
451
Location
New England
Format
Medium Format
There is still nothing like a Nikonos. I used to have one when I canoed regularly in white water, but sadly, sold it years ago. Fully waterproof (not water resistant) with controls optimized for use while wearing gloves. They're still widely available on eBay at under $200, and with several lens choices. You can do everything but drop it into an active volcano.

Andy
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I gave the same answer in OP post in MF, Pentax IQ WR or Konica Off Road. Nikonos is good, needs to late model, but you can get a Pentax WR or Konica Off Road for less than $50.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,294
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Nikonos was the first thing I thought when I saw the thread title. As long as the o-rings are good, it's a dive camera. Nikonos muddy? Just hose it down.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Forgot the Minolta Weathermatic, good to about 15 feet, has 35mm and 80 mm lens, if you get a complete set you can get the sports finder, weather proof film canisters.

 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format

I have the Nikonos V, Nikon ActionTouch LW35AF, Pentax WR 90 - all mentioned above.

The Nikonos is indestructible. I fell off my skateboard with one and it flew down the street like a hockey puck. It just had a few scratches on it (which bummed me out as before it was perfect!). Any other camera I own (Nikon F, F2 etc) would have exploded into a million pieces.. Fantastic lens too. Superb massive optical viewfinder.
The Nikon ActionTouch LW35 has a superb lens, excellent flash that you decide when you use it, and waterproof down a few feet. However it is not that rugged from drops so try not to drop it! Really fun to use camera.
The Pentax is splash proof/good for rain. Has a zoom lens. You cannot turn off the flash - it will fire when it decides. Super cheap. Absolutely fantastic lens - see the image below with 1:1 crop:




 

grahamp

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
1,706
Location
Vallejo (SF Bay Area)
Format
Multi Format
When I used to work for a geology department, we had a Nikonos that was used for diving work. However it was great for documenting field work on mudflats and sandbanks around fresh and salt water. Finding something that is water/dust safe and robust enough to survive being dropped is a challenge.
 

GRHazelton

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
2,248
Location
Jonesboro, G
Format
Multi Format
http://www.southern-nikonos.com/ specializes in the Nikonos cameras, and can replace the seals AND pressure test in water the completed job. My understanding is that for splash and shallow immersion, to perhaps 3 or 4 feet, their full service might not be needed, but why take the chance? They have orange rings and seals for storage, to avoid flattening the underwater seals. Their turn around time is fast and IIRC, they charged about $125. for re-sealing my Nikonos III.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
Konica off Road as it was mentioned.
It was made to be in use on construction sites. I used it under the rain.
Here is also Canon Sure Shot WP-1 weatherproof point and shoot 35mm film camera.
Simple camera, but Fred Herzog was OK to use it.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jun 1, 2017
Messages
33
Location
Moscow - Warsaw
Format
Multi Format
Thank you so much for all of your replies folks!

Analyzing the answers:

  1. Minolta Weathermatic looks good... what I really didn't like is the fully auto flash that you can't switch off
  2. Fuji ToughGuy also looks good, but it seems to be rarer and more expensive than other models. Moreover, in most of the listing on eBay the seller warns about "Self-timer doesn't work... also some problems with flash", so maybe it's a known issue with that one?
  3. Nikonos... of course... I'm a diver also and have been eyeing them for a long time The only thing I don't like about it is that it's a bit bulky and expensive. And paying $125 for re-sealing it doesn't sound like a good deal
  4. Pentax WR is actually a great one and very cheap... but the lens is crummy (long, dark zoom; can't imagine using it in field conditions without a tripod, less than adequate lighting and no flash due to long distances, for example)
  5. Nikon ActionTouch L35 AW: nice one but again, can't really find it online for a "normal" price (not $170!)
  6. ...while browsing, I stumbled upon Sea&Sea Motor Marine cameras! Will review them
  7. I think that I'll go with the Konica Genbakantoku (Off-Road). Lots of offers online for $60 or so in exc condition. It looks like precisely the answer to my predicament: dust/waterproof, moderately lightweight and portable, and built for extreme conditions such as daily abuse by construction workers
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,433
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format
I used to have a Chinon Splash GX that I would take snowboarding. I bought it new in the early 1990's, It worked great, I used it for years. It has a heavy duty latch to close the film chamber, eventually that's what broke on mine. I continued to use it after that using a rubber band to hold it shut. I remember they advertised how tough it was, I did land on it a few times snowboarding without damaging it. I was damaged but the camera wasn't. They made several Splash and Active models, I think they meet all your requirements.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jun 1, 2017
Messages
33
Location
Moscow - Warsaw
Format
Multi Format

Hmmm not really I've actually got Nikon FE and don't want to use it in such conditions! I've just came from a trip with FE and that's exactly why I'm asking this question.
FE (or FM for that matter) is built like a tank but they have a lot of fragile mechanical parts... it will survive the drizzle and banging around I guess (in fact mine FE did , but I'd be loath to CLA it after every outing!
Thanks for the advice though.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
The WR version, well sealed, not for underwater, but rain, mud, ok. but OP does want the zoom popping out.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format

Crummy lens???
Did you miss my post above?
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I use mine in the field without a tripod, use 400 or 800 speed color or push Tmax 400 to 800, the lens is somewhat slow 4.5 to 10.5, but rereading the manual " do not drop the camera or hit it on a soild objuect, do not subject it to strong vibrations, use a cushion when traveling by motorcycle, so not for rock climbing. The Konica Off Road is more durable.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
of the Konica Off Road Cameras, this is the one you want

Konica Genba Kantoku DD


image by nik.jalopx (Image rights)
Part of the "Off-Road" series, Konica's Genba Kantoku DD (現場監督DD) is a weather-proof, heavy duty (IPX4 certified) autofocus camera with two focal lengths. It can be regarded as the ruggedised version of the weather-proof bifocal Konica MR.640, with similar controls and features, though it adds a third autofocus sensor for higher focusing precision. Intended for use by construction workers (genba kantoku means "site supervisor") the finder has marks for making panoramas to be stitched together from prints. After 15 minutes, the camera shuts off to conserve batteries.

Specifications
  • Wide angle: 40 mm f/3,5 (3 elements, 3 groups).
  • Tele: 60 mm f/5,2 (6 elements, 6 groups).
  • Shutter: Programmed electromagnetic shutter/diaphragm, speeds from 1/5 to 1/500 s. Electronic self timer.
  • Focus: Active infrared autofocus, closest range 0,9 m.
  • Exposure: EV 6–17 (wide): EV 7–17 (tele).
  • Finder: Bright frame viewinder with parallax corrections marks, focus confirmation, low light warning.
  • Flash: Built-in flash (flashmatic). Auto-flash, forced flash, flash off modes. Slow sync flash possible.
  • Flash range: 5 m (wide, ISO 100), 4 m (tele, ISO 100).
  • DX decoding from ISO 50 to 3200. Non-DX film is set as ISO 100.
  • Power: 2CR5 6 V lithium battery. CR2025 3V cell for date back.
  • Dimensions and weight: 144x74x74 mm, 385 g (without batteries).
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jun 1, 2017
Messages
33
Location
Moscow - Warsaw
Format
Multi Format
Crummy lens???
Did you miss my post above?

Nope, and thanks for sharing the picture with us Huss.

I wasn't referring to technical IQ or sharpness; in fact, I've never cared too much about it even when I was bowing to the false prophets of Numeric Gods
What I meant is that the zoom is very slow... of course, like Paul said, I could shoot something like Tri-X and push it to 3200, but more often than not I prefer Ektar 100 for travel photos And light conditions could be challenging in travels... in fact, last time I was using 135mm/3.5 which is much faster than WR's lens but couldn't take some shots due to slow shutter speeds!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…