arigram said:If in Kastellorizo its 100%, would it be also in Asia Minor in Turkey?
I guess I'll have to live with the 94%...
Too bad I don't have any special glasses.
Many ND filters are "leaky" at IR, as it's presumed that they'll be used for films with limited IR sensitivity. So you can't be sure you're getting the true specified density in IR. You may remember that Galileo went blind. He observed the sun through carbon deposited on glass from a candle flame, which cut the sun's intensity enough for comfort, but still passed longer wavelengths and so he burned his retinas out in comfort.George Papantoniou said:What about a ND6.0 (20 stops -) PLUS the IR filter ? In fact, I made a trial looking at the sun (just for a second) through the IR filter and it looked dim (but I guess that since I cannot see the IR radiation, it was there and it's still dangerous to the retina)... Maybe I'll stick to the arcwelders mask...
I'd strongly avise against the developed film method because of the danger of not developing to completion and the variable quantities of silver and grain distribution in modern films. If done by someone with insufficient experience by which to judge the end product it's a huge risk, and not worth it when high quality, safe filters are readily available. I would never do it myself, and I have 40 years of photographic experience. I also work in an observatory and teach college astronomy labs, including safe solar viewing. You don't have nerve endings in your retina that will tell you when you're burning them, and you can blind yourself without knowing it. At lower, but lethal exposure levels it can take hours or days for your retinal cells to die.Tom A said:Forget the IR-filter! It just gives a false sense of security.
The ND6.0 filter will do - if it blocks for IR-radiation. I don't know how effectiv the ND-filters are, on heliopans webside they show the transmissioncurves for a few ND-filter, but only till 800nm and there is a lot more IR-radiation beyond the 800 nm.
In the good old days (back when all people used film), it was not unusual to make a makeshift solarfilter from a piece of exposed B&W-film, which is just as safe as the expensive but optical better solarfilters.
To make a makeshift filter, take a b&w-film (preferably 120-format, big is better) with a lot of silver in it, Tri-X or Pan F. Roll the film out and expose it to daylight for a minut or more (every grain of silver has to be exposed). Then develop it as normal. It can all be done in daylight
Mount a double layer (one layer is not enough) of this film in a cardboardframe, with the emulsionsides facing each other, to avoide scratches in the emulsion, and you will have a safe solarfilter.
The safety in this filter relays on the metallic silver and therefore it is not possible to use film which are processed in C-41 or E6, as they don't contain any silver.
Because the silvergrains scatters the light, the filter is not good for photography (use the ND6.0 filter on your camera instead, if you still have the intend to photograph the eclipse), but the filmfilter is okay for visual use.
Tom
NASA said:The Sun can be viewed directly only when using filters specifically designed for this purpose. Such filters usually have a thin layer of aluminum, chromium or silver deposited on their surfaces that attenuates ultraviolet, visible, and infrared energy. One of the most widely available filters for safe solar viewing is a number 14 welder's glass, available through welding supply outlets. More recently, aluminized mylar has become a popular, inexpensive alternative. Mylar can easily be cut with scissors and adapted to any kind of box or viewing device. A number of sources for solar filters are listed below. No filter is safe to use with any optical device (i.e. - telescope, binoculars, etc.) unless it has been specifically designed for that purpose. Experienced amateur and professional astronomers may also use one or two layers of completely exposed and fully developed black-and-white film, provided the film contains a silver emulsion. Since all developed color films lack silver, they are always unsafe for use in solar viewing.
Unsafe filters include color film, some non-silver black and white film, medical x-ray films with images on them, smoked glass, photographic neutral density filters and polarizing filters. Solar filters designed to thread into eyepieces which are often sold with inexpensive telescopes are also dangerous. They should not be used for viewing the Sun at any time since they often crack from overheating. Do not experiment with other filters unless you are certain that they are safe. Damage to the eyes comes predominantly from invisible infrared wavelengths. The fact that the Sun appears dark in a filter or that you feel no discomfort does not guarantee that your eyes are safe. Avoid all unnecessary risks. Your local planetarium or amateur astronomy club is a good source for additional information.
arigram said:If in Kastellorizo its 100%, would it be also in Asia Minor in Turkey?
I guess I'll have to live with the 94%...
Too bad I don't have any special glasses.
arigram said:The best way to view an eclipse:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?