Topcon SuperDM K mount, the camera that could have been?

$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 3
  • 112
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 145
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 139
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 6
  • 0
  • 109
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 8
  • 149

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,800
Messages
2,781,054
Members
99,708
Latest member
sdharris
Recent bookmarks
0

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Topcon made one body in a Kmount, the RM300, a RE300 with K mount lens. Soon afterwards Topcon got out of the camera business. What if Topcon had upgraded the SuperDM to K mount, added a shutter with 1/2000 of a second along with an adaptor to use Re lens on the K mount body? Light meter built into the body, interchangeable focusing screens, motor drive and winder. Nikon F2 or Pentax LX.
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,823
Format
Multi Format
Hmm. Exakta/Topcon mount's register is 44.7 mm. K-mount's register is 45.46 mm. RE Topcon lenses can't be adapted to K-mount body.
 

Oren Grad

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,619
Format
Large Format
Topcon did not manufacture the RM 300 - it was just a re-badge of a camera sold under several other names. They were already throwing in the towel at that point after a long decline in their credibility as a serious competitor in the 35mm market . Even aside from the mount register problem, at that point there was no plausible scenario that would have justified the investment required to bring a new high-end model to market.

EDIT: One final point - by the time the RM 300 came along, the Canon New F-1, Nikon F3 and Pentax LX were under development - all three were brought to market in 1980-81. In the context of where the market was going at that point, a warmed-over Super DM would have been obsolete the moment it hit the street.
 
Last edited:

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,757
Format
35mm
From what I have read, the RE200, RE300 and later variants were made by CIMA KOGAKU. The same goes for the 55/1.7 which came with them. The 55 will fit the older Topcon RE series cameras bur the 58/1.4 Topcor will not mount on these later cameras. A part f the rear of the lens sticks out to protect the rear element in case the lens is placed rear element down. The 55 is not a bad lens but I prefer the older 58/1.8. I still sometimes use my older Topcon cameras, usually with a hand held meter. In 1963 an SLR with TTL full aperture metering was an interesting and useful thing. It's surprising how well some of these old RE Super/Super DM cameras still work, at least their shutters work. The connection between the mirror mounted meter and the battery was a weak point. You were still dealing with a horizontal cloth shutter with a slow flash synch speed. Olympus was a hold-out with its horizontal cloth shutter and 1/2000 top shutter speed but the trend was toward vertical shutters with higher top speeds and higher flash synch speeds. While the RE Super/Super DM was still being made, Topcon also made the RE2/D-1, which had a vertical metal shutter. I think there was more potential in developing that model, maybe with a higher top shutter speed and a silicon meter cell. One day I might get an RE300 with the winder to round out the collection.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom