That's a good looking camera. I've never heard of it, ...
...
I discovered the film is very sensitive as well. I put the film in with much care, but still got light bands on my first 4 shots due to it being light struck during loading. On several of the shots the focus is so spotty I think the film must not be held flat at all.
That's a good looking camera. I've never heard of it, but it sure is beautiful! Enjoy!
127 film is notorious for light leaks, you need to load it in very low light or learn how to do it in total darkness. Same goes for unloading until you get it back in the can. If I don't have a can I bring small squares of tin foil to wrap it in. I'm not sure what to make of the banding, the leaf shutter wouldn't cause that. When I use old cameras with the red windows on the back I usually do something to cover the windows. Sometimes light finds a way in through there.
One way to check the focus is to put some translucent tape across where the film would be and focus on it at know distances. Your focus scale could be off.
Put the negatives back in the camera as they would have been shot. Now look at places to either side of the actual image being shot at he moment. Thosle look like leaks that happen to the film before or after it is exposed.
Go into a dark room and wait. Open the back, put a flashlight inside the film spool chambers. Have the front open and look very carefully at the bellows AND the hinge, latches, etc.
Also look at the rollers and where they are held top and bottom. Somewhat hard bands like that often come from the rollers cutting off light from a leak and concentrating it.
Although loading and/or a loose roll is possible, they sure look like leaks near hard objects. Loose spooling leaks tend to be much more amorphous and erratic.
Goldammer was one of the smaller works, making various types. But I admit I never cane across any model.
Hi,
hmm, it seems you are spooling too much of the paper when loading.
With this camera the film transport is controled by one of the red windows,
so there is no need to spool until the arrows are visible like on the photo.
I would try only to put that much paper on the taking spool that it is securely moved by the turning knob.
Nice camera btw.
Best
Jens
Goldammer was one of the smaller works, making various types. But I admit I never cane across any model.
I have no idea who which manufacturer made mine but it definitely has the less expensive shutter with top speed of 100!
Several thoughts
1. It is an adorable camera.
2. I second the point about 127 needing extra care in loading. It is very susceptible to light leaks.
3. Phone app light meters are total crap. I have tried a number of them thru the years and none are better than one stop off.
4. The Rerachrome needs to be shot at 200 and it overexposes very quickly. Even at 200 the film comes out disturbingly yellow, so I have found a blue color correction filter (light blue, not sure of the exact number as that filter has no metal rim) really helps give more natural colors.
5. If the focus scale does not move if may be like the Baby Bessa. You have to hit the right one of the six leads of the lens mount thread. If someone took it apart and didn't pay attention to that, the focus will be off.
Enjoy. Folders are fun but can be habit forming and addictive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?