too much info on the scan?

Death's Shadow

A
Death's Shadow

  • 2
  • 4
  • 67
Friends in the Vondelpark

A
Friends in the Vondelpark

  • 1
  • 0
  • 83
S/S 2025

A
S/S 2025

  • 0
  • 0
  • 75
Street art

A
Street art

  • 1
  • 0
  • 68
20250427_154237.jpg

D
20250427_154237.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 84

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,454
Messages
2,759,414
Members
99,376
Latest member
jaanus20
Recent bookmarks
0

MIKE POBEGA

Member
Joined
May 28, 2021
Messages
29
Location
Staten Island NY
Format
Pinhole
I am trying to reflect a pure image, unencumbered by BS but is this too much info to include? I have always likes the borders myself.

Negs came and I find myself scanning today. :smile: photrio1.jpg
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,106
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
I think it is a matter of personal preference and depends upon what you're trying to say with the photo. I would not include the film edge markings but that's just me. To me, including the edge markings distracts from the actual picture.


Edit: Incidentally, your question really has nothing to do with the scan and mentioning scan in the pure analog area is asking for a shit storm...so, you might want to edit your post and title (not sure you can edit the title though)...or ask the mods to move the thread to the ethics and philosophy area :smile:
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,940
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
You can always ask the moderators to change your title to "Too Much Info in the Image?"
Just Report your Post, and include the request.
You could also ask that the thread be moved to the Presentation and Marketing sub-forum in the General Discussion (Mixed Workflow) part of the site.
The question isn't really exclusive to Pinhole photography.
With my pinhole photos, I sometimes like to include the edge artifacts that are added by the camera. Here is a fortuitous example:
upload_2021-6-24_16-26-58.png


I don't normally care to include the edge writing.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,940
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
  • wiltw
  • wiltw
  • Deleted
  • Reason: cuz

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,070
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
IMO, whether to include rebates or edge markings is a personal and artistic decision. For myself, I usually barely crop off the rebate, but I've seen a lot of images I liked a lot that had edge markings, partial or complete sprocket holes, etc.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,505
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Love that boat shot! I'm not a color person when it comes to photography, and would love to see a B&W version of this, but it works great just as it is because of the very strong composition. Good stuff.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,140
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The only problem I have with printing the rebate is when I see a rebate for Kodak Tri-X on a color print or Kodak Portra 400 on a black & white print, but our on site slave trader would probably have no problem with that.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Is this just an issue with pinhole photography?

There was a time (back then) when I found composites from filmstrips interesting. Today I find the rebates cluttered wit graphics (DX codes, etc.) that I dislike showing the rebates.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom