Mike
you sound like me.
I was/am/have been in a simliar situation. keep in mind any of these comments just come from my testing/experience and its just that, only mine and not expert at all, nor all that extensive.
I started out doing VDB prints and then started fooling with toning them.
You mentioned about "aren't you able, really, to make a pt/pd print in a bit shorter, quicker, easier and cheaper method when you tone a VDB/Kallitype instead of doing the traditional pt/pd method?"
my experience with this is that toning a VDB with either palladium/platinum gives a distinctly different print in tone and appearance than a traditional platinum/palladium... The control is no where near as workable with VDBs and toning as doing a straight pt/pd I found. Plus you just seem to get a "nicer" print in my mind with a straight palladium/platinum. again, completely personal opinion. Ive taken many negatives and printed the same negative in a bunch of different variations: straight palladium, straight VDB, selenium toned VDB, Gold toned VDB, platinum toned VDB, palladium toned VDB... when they were all done and dry it was really eye opening to seem them side by side. So different and such diversity... all coming from the same negative.
One thing I really have found is its completely personal opinion... Ive shown many people the different prints and some people just love straight VDBs, some prefer palladium prints, some just hate them out right and wonder why I dont use a digital camera.
Im partial to Palladium prints but, I personally still love VDB prints.... in fact I prefer them over the toned ones.
Although the one really cool thing is like sandy has likely stated you are able to create a really archival print by toning van dyke browns.
I dont know even a little about Kallitypes but I recently printed off Sandys article and really wanna try them out at some point in the future.
guess one of the things I found was most useful was just experimenting with all the different possibilities then seeing which one I was most pleased with.
hope that helps.... I have very limited experience.. but that limited experience is with VDBs, toning them, and with some palladium printing.
Michael Slade said:
Sandy,
You're getting to the crux of my dillemma. The VDB is such an easy formula to mix, and so darn easy to develop, that I'm wondering why Pt/Pd is so attractive to many
I can see that the pt/pd print has a different look to it, but maybe I haven't been around enough of them to see much of a difference from a well done Kallitype or VDB.
With the noble metals being replaced when they are toned, aren't you able, really, to make a pt/pd print in a bit shorter, quicker, easier and cheaper method when you tone a VDB/Kallitype instead of doing the traditional pt/pd method?
Just curious. The VDB appeals to me on so many levels and I'm having so much fun doing them that I may not do as many pt/pd prints as I had initially thought I would.
Thoughts?