I'll remember that as well. I was considering an F6 purchase. How does it compare to an F100?
I'll remember that as well. I was considering an F6 purchase. How does it compare to an F100?
I'm very seriously considering purchasing one -- I've got an F5, and while I love it, the F6 has some great features.
Robert,
Oh please don't do this to me! I've been resisting the siren call of an F6 for two years now.
What do you think one could get selling an F5?
I'm very seriously considering purchasing one -- I've got an F5, and while I love it, the F6 has some great features.
I jumped from the F4 to the F6, and I really like the F6. Part of the reason is that it is smaller and lighter than either the F4 or F5, and that makes it nicer for travel. So far I have not missed the interchangable viewfinders, and F6's AF is miles ahead of the F4.
I don't notice much difference between the metering of the two, but if I had to give one the edge I think the F4's matrix meter does a better job on chromes than the F6's.
It's a very nice camera, I do like it.
My biggest concern with the camera, without the external battery holder, is that it is just too small. I'll only buy the camera if the external battery holder is available at the same time.
I find the size and weight of the F5 is perfect for shooting, and from what I have seen the F6 is a smaller camera - about the same size as the D200. This is why I am hesitant. Of course, I would remove the battery holder while traveling (one of the big pluses for the camera) - to keep the weight down.
Even though the F5 has more features and conveniences that the F-100; when travelling (as I did last weekend to a wedding in Memphis) I prefer the F-100 because I can remove the battery pack and "carry light".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?