What? I've been in most of the 50 states, and Utah remains my favorite for photography. Like Kerry says, Moab would be a good starting place. There are months, perhaps years, of intensive photography within a day's drive of there. However, as others have implied, fine photographs are where you look for them. Many Weston masterpieces were shot in or just outside his home.
The difficulty with "close to home" is that it can be difficult to see the photographic potential in something you see every day. Travelling to some far-off place makes it easier to see the potential - but that doesn't necessarily lead to better pictures.
Within 100 miles of Vancouver Washington: The short list.
Columbia River
Columbia Gorge
Mt. Hood
Mt. Saint Helens
Mt. Adams
North Cascades
South Cascades
Glacier Mounds
Ape Cave
Within 200 miles of Vancouver Washington: The short list.
Mt. Rainier National Park
Olympic National Park
Washington Pacific Coastline
Oregon Pacific Coastline
Oregon Sand Dunes
Oregon High Desert
Smith Rock
Three Sisters
Pugut Sound
Hood Canal
Columba Basin
Within 300 miles of Vancouver Washington: The short list.
San Juan Islands
Crater Lake National Park
Oregon Painted Hills
John Day Fossil Beds
Mt. Baker
Mckenzie Pass
Rouge River
Hell's Canyon
Snake River
Frasier River
Lakes, Rivers, Waterfalls, and Wilderness Trails abound as well as National Forests and protected areas. There are four distinct Seasons to the year.
All are welcome, "Take nothing but Photographs, Leave nothing but Footprints"!
That's about a 5-hour drive, I believe. 3 1/2 hour to Stryn, another hour to Geiranger seems about right.
But I'd probably get no further than Dead Link Removed near Stryn...
But despite all of these, the one place that my brain cannot let go of is Canyonlands National Park in Utah.
I live on the edge of wilderness in its truest form
Murray
The difficulty with "close to home" is that it can be difficult to see the photographic potential in something you see every day. Travelling to some far-off place makes it easier to see the potential - but that doesn't necessarily lead to better pictures.
The difficulty with "close to home" is that it can be difficult to see the photographic potential in something you see every day. Travelling to some far-off place makes it easier to see the potential - but that doesn't necessarily lead to better pictures.
'Tis not too bad in this neck of the woods - no crowds, no security hassles, no dangerous creatures out in the bush, and what is probably the clearest air in the world - it gets changed quite often round these parts....
Yeah, me too. At least until it's completely scraped off the planet by giant cranes and earthmovers, and its underlying sediments shovelled into trucks and refined into oil.
The biggest problem I have photographing locally is that all the spots I used to go are now overrun with people, especially on the weekends. The crowds and traffic here are just getting to be too much. One of the reasons I love going to Australia - much quieter and the country more open.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?