TMY pushed in Rodinal 1:100

Roses & Candle

A
Roses & Candle

  • 0
  • 0
  • 61
Im Hip

A
Im Hip

  • 0
  • 0
  • 2K

Forum statistics

Threads
199,573
Messages
2,793,456
Members
99,954
Latest member
Jeff Huang
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Before I give this a go by just guessing, does anyone have a good starting point as to what time I should use for a two stop push of TMY in Rodinal 1:100? The Massive Dev Chart doesn't even give push times in Rodinal for 1:50...I'm guessing that no one does this. I did it once in D76...I'd kind of like to see what it comes out like with Rodinal.
 
OP
OP
Stephanie Brim
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Okay, decided to wing it...with good results. The film was exposed at f/2, 1/15th of a second. Developed in Rodinal 1:100 for 50 minutes with five inversions every five minutes. I'll post the images when I get the film dry.
 

argus

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,128
Format
Multi Format
Hi Stephanie,

I'm very curious to see the results as a lot of people claim that Rodinal does not have very good pushing capability.
I am glad you tried it. Please post your images to show us your expierence. Could you add some straight negative scans too?

Greetings,
G
 
OP
OP
Stephanie Brim
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
It's going to be grainy...i'm just hoping for pleasant grain. If it's golfball-sized, I hope that it's PLEASANT golfballs. :wink:

Also note that I did this with 35mm film. Your milage with other formats may vary.
 
OP
OP
Stephanie Brim
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Okay. The biggest problem I saw was that details in the shadows are nonexistant. I think it would work with some applications and not others.

roadwork.jpg

roadwork2.jpg

roadwork3.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Pretty typical for underexposure. My favorite push is Tri-X in Diafine. Normal speed is 1600. Gives adequate shadow detail.
- Thom
 

df cardwell

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
Dearborn,Mic
Format
Multi Format
Agfa's suggested times for Rodinal and TMY are (1+25) 6', and (1+50) 11'

It's safe to estimate a 1+100 time based on the relationship of the lower dilutions.

11' / 6' = 1.8x So, 11' x 1.8 x ( 20' ) is a good place to begin for 1+100.

When we use reduced agitation ( every 5th minute ) it is a pretty good rule to double the time for normal agitation: 20' x 2 = 40'.

The factor for a two stop push for TMY ( taken from the Kodak technical publication ) is about 1.33 x. A factor of 1.5x isn't a bad idea if you are using to minimal agitation to discourage the highlights from running away.

SO, a good estimate for a two stop push in Rodinal at 1+100, with minimal agitation, is 40 x 1.5, or 60 minutes. The 10 minutes extra beyond the 50' you used will make a big difference.

Rodinal's strength is in the midtones and highlights. Compared to D76 or XTOL, it gives up a bit of shadow detail which can be compensated for at normal speeds; minimal agitation will give a full box speed with great tonality.

But PUSHING ( which with rare exceptions ) will never build density in the shadows: increasing film speed.

You CAN expect TMY at 1600 to 3200 from XTOL. At 1+1 with reduced agitation, it is a handsome look.
.
 

blokeman

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
140
Location
Melbourne
Format
Multi Format
Hi Stephanie, I used TMY with Rodinal 1:100 for many years, I've since changed to another film. My time was 17 3/4 minutes at 20 deg C. Of course we all have different times, mine were arrived at originally by using a densitometer and the ASA was 400. Not much more I can say really, they were always excellent negatives.
 

blokeman

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
140
Location
Melbourne
Format
Multi Format
.....Sorry, I forgot to add the 2 stop push bit... my 'N' was as I said 17 3/4 mins. N +1 was 22 minutes and N +2 was around 27 minutes. That is all from the densitometer mathematics. I never actually pushed with Rodinal, there are other developers better suited to perform this task. Good Luck.
 
OP
OP
Stephanie Brim
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
I kind of like the look that I got from the first two. The street was pratically deserted even though that street connects to Old Highway 20. The low shadow detail kind of gets the mood for the night.

Oh, and as per Mr. Cardwell's post, The first thing I thought was 60 minutes. I should have stayed with my gut on this one.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I don't know if it's been said here earlier, but with such a high dilution, it's also important to make sure there's enough developer in the solution to prevent exhaustion. I processed two rolls of 35mm in a 2-roll Paterson tank, with just enough developer to cover the two spools. It turned out to be too little developer, and it wouldn't have mattered if I had developed for twice the time. Probably just more fog.
Then I switched to doing one roll in a 2-roll tank, but fill it with developer solution at 1+100, and I got solid negatives again.

Just a thought...

- Thom
 
OP
OP
Stephanie Brim
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
I used a two roll tank with 500ml of water and 5ml of Rodinal for one roll.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom