Alessandro, to overcome emulsion damage you can also try a different thing. When using Tetenal Eukobrom in the same amount as Rodinal it has the same contrast as Rodinal and damages FP4 film. When using the same amount of Tetenal Variospeed W, the development activity and contrast is higher but the emulsion is not damaged!Alessandro Serrao said:Thanks to Hans and his very precious piece of advice (of halving the permanganate concentration) I'm now able to run the process up to 22°C without damage to the emulsion.
Hmm, you may got me wrong. Let's paint the picture this way:Alessandro Serrao said:This sounds to me as a pH issue: maybe the Eukobrom, as the Rodinal, have both a high pH (due to the sodium hydroxide). Maybe using a first developer with a lower pH could prove beneficial but... I did know that developing activity is on par with high pH.
This also tells me that (being two radically different developers) they yeld the same contrast, assuming the developing time and temperature are the same. This could mean that they are interchangeables without changing drastically all the other parameters. Extremely interesting.
In Germany it is not allowed for private persons to buy potassium dichromate.Donald Qualls said:I'm using Dichromate bleach ... I posted a couple scans in the thread where I announced my results (3-4 weeks ago).
You probably mix it up. Emulsion problems only appeared during the test-in phase. Rodinal does not create emulsion problems with the current recipe.Alessandro Serrao said:See...???!!
Hans: I understood that Rodinal created emulsion problems.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?