Harry Lime
Allowing Ads
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2005
- Messages
- 495
- Format
- 35mm RF
Indeed that was a little hard time to so many. I remember same period Fuji discontinued their amateuric E6 film: Sensia in ISO 200/400 I did not so much wonder about. But they ALSO discontinued Sensia 100....??? The conceptation was obviously to stop the last cheap E6 film. And higher prices to remaining professionell E6 films. Since that we can see double - tribble pricing.The ironic in history is (ALSO caused from general high pricing to films today) We will see the come back of Kodak E6. To that same reason (highest price niveau) we have back Tmax3200.My sentiments exactly! Kodachrome? Consigned to history, I'm afraid. Ektachrome? Still waiting, somewhat anxiously. Now down to 49 rolls of, deep frozen, PB 01/14 E100G, 20 rolls of PB 01/14 E100VS in 35mm, and 14 propacks of PB 01/14 E100G in 120. Exhaustion of 120 E100G will bring an end to 39 years of medium format color work...
I remember an internet dealer you may got it for less (If you order 10 rolls) - then the shipping cost is not that point and you may have it at USD 8,- a roll. If you add the shipping $6,- it is a little cheaper than USD 10,-Yesterday I walked into a store in 2018 and bought a few fresh rolls of TMAX P3200.
I'm still looking at those boxes in disbelief.
It's not cheap at $10 per roll, but I'm not a spray and pray kind of shooter. Obviously I wish it was cheaper, but given the choice between paying a little extra and not having it at all, I'll pay up. Hopefully enough people feel the same way and we'll have this film around for many years to come.
Kudos to Kodak for doing this.
PS: Kodachrome...
P3200 is not expensive! It costs as much as it cost when it was discontinued in 2012. Taking inflation into consideration it is now actually cheaper. At B&H it's actually cheaper than Delta3200.Yesterday I walked into a store in 2018 and bought a few fresh rolls of TMAX P3200.
I'm still looking at those boxes in disbelief.
It's not cheap at $10 per roll, but I'm not a spray and pray kind of shooter. Obviously I wish it was cheaper, but given the choice between paying a little extra and not having it at all, I'll pay up. Hopefully enough people feel the same way and we'll have this film around for many years to come.
Kudos to Kodak for doing this.
PS: Kodachrome...
P3200 is not expensive!
I tried a roll. Didn't see much difference between TMZ and sacrificing one step of shadow value using TMY. Kodak claims the actual speed of TMZ is 1000 anyway, and not 3200, if you read the "fine print" in the Tech Sheet. So 800 works for me.
Have you tried Microphen? I've never tried DD-X as it's just too expensive here and I can't import liquid developers.I'm one of those folks who can't stand Delta 3200's grain structure in most cases. When I've wanted a faster film, HP5+ in DDX can look very good out to 1600, and holds very good shadow detail considering it's 2 stops under. That DDX is some impressive stuff.
Nice. ......P3200 is not expensive! It costs as much as it cost when it was discontinued in 2012. Taking inflation into consideration it is now actually cheaper. At B&H it's actually cheaper than Delta3200.
I still can't believe we have it back.
I usually shoot P3200 around 1250-1600. For me it's mostly about the tonality and grain. P3200 has a somewhat unique look
My standby high speed combo is TMY400-2 pushed to 1250 and developed in Diafine, which works quite well.
I just checked BH and they have it for $8.99, which is better than my local shop @ $10/roll.
(Delta 3200 @ BH is $9.29).
$ 22,90 would also be not as cheapThat's true. When a box of film costs you $26.40 a roll, then consider using the term expensive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?