Ole said:I had a Lubitel for a while, long enough to learn that I liked the larger negatives. Then I sold it to a friend for two beers in a bar - a fair exhange
Paul (I assume you mean me), I agree totally that it's good to experiment with low-cost equipment, it's just that I think the Lubitel has potential for major confusion with less experienced photographers. It is not only very tough to focus, it has no shutter speeds slower than 1/15, so beginners cannot practice shooting off a tripod at f16, which is where the triplet lens would give best definition, and also the shutter speeds (at least on mine) are dubious, which would confuse someone trying to expose their film accurately. As others have remarked, if you want medium-format quality at rock-bottom prices, the best way to go can be with a folding camera (Agfa Isolette, Zeiss Nettar, etc.). I have a Kodak 66 Mark III folder which cost £25 in mint condition and which I would prefer to a Lubitel every time.PB001 said:Hey David,
I like the academic, historical commentary ...
Paul (I assume you mean me), I agree totally that it's....
Hi Dave,
Touche [is that how you spell it...I've never been too good a French] I guess we could go round in circles debating this point, talking about the pros & cons of the humble plastic artifact. This may use up valuable typing space, but that's probably about all? Interesting though?
Hey Nicole,
If you finally manges to get one from somewhere, I look forward to hearing all about it!!
Paul Berry
David A. Goldfarb said:I'd also recommend staying away from the Lubitel and it's Chinese comrade, the Seagull. If you're looking for a decent TLR that's not too expensive, try a Minolta Autocord or Yashicamat.
Nicole, a Yashicamat LM was my entry to MF a couple of years back. Cost $180 oz dollars.Nicole Boenig-McGrade said:I want one!!!!!
David H. Bebbington said:Must disagree here - the Lubitel was part of a KGB plot to drive imperialist warmongers and running dogs of capitalism crazy. It has a peculiar viewfinder copied from an old Voigtländer camera called a Brilliant which was a non-focusing viewfinder. The Lubitel viewfinder has had a very small and dim center spot added, which is the only part you can use for focusing, and is excruciatingly difficult to use. Buy a Lubitel and I guarantee you will throw it away in disgust and be put off TLRs for life.
gnashings said:Like with most Russian optics, I found that you have to spend a lot more to rival the qualityof the glass (at least in the two I have had, one that I still do).
Its simple to use and impossible to break unless you drop it on concrete amd/or kick it with a steel-toe boot.
While I knew that my TLR experience, consisting solely of a Lubitel at this point, would not meet the rarified standards of the people who sneer at things that don't say Haselblad, Leica or Rollei on them - I think the little camera deserves better than it gets (and yes, I may have sentiment on my side - I got my first one when I was 10!).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?