Hi, I'm real new here and don't quite know how to navigate to ask a question so please forgive any wrong moves and direct me to the right area if I'm in the wrong place. I recently purchased a Rolleiflex GX and, although the original screen was bright, I had a Maxwell (I think) screen from a previous GX that's brighter so I switched 'em. The newer screen IS brighter but it is a matte field with gridlines and no microprism or split image in the center. With my eyes I need something more to confirm focus, even using the built-in magnifier. Can anyone help me identify the screen I've put in and tell me whether there's a means to trade with someone else for a split-image or if I should just try to sell the screen and get a maxwell with a split image? I could use some good advice. Thanks, Bob.
I think like you I need the split image. I guess in your place I would first contact Bill Maxwell and confirm that the one with no microprism or split image is indeed a Maxwell. Then I would sell it on ebay or here in APUG and buy from Bill a Maxwell screen that has a split image. Or perhaps get the Beattie screen.
Dennis
If you don't mind, I would like to join your TLR users group. I have a Rolleiflex TLR 2.8 80 Planar. I own this beauty for a hell of a long time. It is one great camera.
Jeff
Just out of curiosity, was there ever a small format (35mm film) TLR made, or a TLR that was not square format? I know of the mini 127 Yashicas (and Rolleis, of course), but that's it. (The guy at the camera repair shop I sometimes use keeps jokingly trying to get me to buy the little blue one that has been in his display case for years.)
When I got my Rollie from my father there was device or insert that you place in the camera that will let you use 35mm film. I never got around using it. One of these days I have to got to try it to see how it works.
2F/ 2F - Yes there was the Zeiss Contaflex http://corsopolaris.net/supercameras/contaflex/contaflex.html that are very rare and highly prized by collectors these days, you would probably have to take out a second mortgage on your wife and kids to buy a system !
I just posted an image in the gallery "frosted wildflowers". Another shot from Boxing Day 2007, shot on Agfa Optima 400. (a truly lovely film... I have five or six rolls left...)
Cheers,
Tom
I loved Optima, but liked Portrait 160 even more, muted colour and very low contrast made it the wedding film for me (love to have a couple of rolls now).
I remember when I owned a lab I had optima and portrait paper too, Agfa had a great range of very underestimated materials.
I think they are liked more in Europe than the states?
BTW I love the colours in your shot, are they teasels?
Mark
Hi Mark;
I think they might be teasels. They were beside a patch of Queen Anne's Lace, so I knew enough not to call them that. (though when Queen Anne's close up, they take on a form very similar, but less dense)
Honestly though, I am (sometimes) the type to bump up contrast and saturation, especially in floral work, but I do really like the understated effect of Optima. I think it tends to draw you more into the image.
Tom
Dennis too bad it's 220 (or I'd buy it from you) as 120 won't work in my Rollei.
I'll keep looking on ebay..
Just as a fun exercise what are the favourite films (any timeframe) of members here. choose 1 B&W 1 Tranny and 1 colour neg film.
I'll go first:
B&W Agfa APX 100
Tranny Fuji Provia 400X
Colour neg Agfa portrait 160
Mark
I do have 60 rolls of 120 APX100 sitting in the freezer but I am waiting for the summer to be over to put it on ebay. I am certain I can get quite a lot of money for it on ebay and I can't afford to give a good deal even to an apuger in my financial condition. So I am sorry about that.
My favorite films are Tmax 100 I guess and Kodak portrait film whatever it is called. I don't shoot transparency.
Dennis
Dennis I just secured 20 Agfapan 100 in 120 from ebay (with 10 RSX 100) for about £15 incl p&p so I'm happy for now. If I can't get APX there's Rollei retro and I think fotoimpex are due to make a 'new APX' later this year...
If you found that deal on ebay you were very lucky. You are saying you got 30 rolls of film for less than 30 USD? That is so lucky I had to see it to believe it so I just went through a few hundred completed listings for Agfa, Agfapan, Apx, and 120 and didn't find record of even one recent agfa 100 in 120 sale. And at a dollar a roll it would have been the cheapest film by far of any that aren't competely way outdated.
Dennis
I was lucky the guy had it listed under a wrong title, "A job lot of 30 film spools'
here is the item- 120283506679 I got it for £17.50 (my memory thought cheaper) the 20 Agfapan 100 were outdated by 2004 I think but seem OK and were shrink wrapped & supposedly frozen.
I'm a lucky guy
Speaking of film deals, I'm down to my last 6 rolls of Agfa Optima. (the film I used in my last couple of postings) I bought 20 rolls for $20 last year. A great deal and a wonderful film. I'm at the point I'm getting a little selective about when I break it out. With careful hoarding, It will last a couple of years.
Me, I'm a lucky guy too.
I've been delighted with TMAX 400, and developed the first of my Type 2 film a few nights ago - it's now in for printing at my local shop. Now, I'm using DD-X all the time [instead of Rodinal]. The Type 2 TMAX is exposed at EI 1600, and I'm keen to see how it looks. Over the past 2 years, I've been experimenting with Delta 100, Acros, and FP4+. TMAX 400 might do everything for me; EI 400 in summer, EI 1600 in winter.
Jeff, when you come to frame 12 the camera will just roll through the rest of the film without stopping. If you have some 220 film that is going to go to waste, what you can do is once the counter gets to 12 you can guesstimate how far to crank the film to do another exposure. The shutter will still work and the pressure plate is still in place so it is only the spacing you are worrying about and keeping track of how many pictures you took.
It is better than throwing the film out.
Dennis
Also since the camera senses film automatically I would think frame 1 would still be at the beginning.