HC-110 and RA4 chemistry are the things I rely on. Are they actually made by Kodak or a third party?
HC-110 and RA4 chemistry are the things I rely on. Are they actually made by Kodak or a third party?
HC-110 and RA4 chemistry are the things I rely on. Are they actually made by Kodak or a third party?
If this is helpful, HC-110 was cloned quite a while ago. It's latest non-Kodak incarnation is LegacyPro's L-110. The only real difference is that the L-110 doesn't have the yellow color of the Kodak product.
Actually, almost all of the LegacyPro line of chemicals are Kodak clones. Thus, I would guess that they should be around for quite a while if Kodak does indeed go into bankruptcy. Check out Freestyle's web site for details.
Don't know about RA-4, sorry.
According to my supplier, Kodak jobbed out their ra4 some time ago to champion. In any event, Champion chemistry and Trebla are excellent cheaper subs to the kodak stuff. In fact, my experience is that the Trebla chem. runs quite a bit cleaner than kodak.
What-If...
Kodak starts a campaign to promote film cameras and film products by advertising on TV like thay used to back in the day? After all, most people will believe a product is desireable if advertised often enough by a well known company. Think the Kodak Moment commercials of the kids birthday party and dad is there taking a picture of the kid lit by the candles on the cake, and the Polaroid Swinger comes to mind, just twist the knob and when it says YES, push the button and your picture is ready in 60 seconds. The old commercials almost made you feel left out if you did not have one of these cameras.
<snip>
It's unfortunate that people accept digi images the way they are. I guess if the image is in color and reasonably sharp its OK. When Wal^%$ or Walgre&^% is backed up with a line of people waiting to use the kiosk to make their own snapshots, they come to my place and expect to do the same. Sorry... (Not Sorry), You leave the chip and I'll print the images. Don't know which ones to print they say. How many are on the chip I say. I don't know, 300 or 400 or so they say. So they want to use my equipment and look through the chip just to find a few they want printed in 1 hour or less for 20 cents each, take up all my time talking about composition and cropping blah blah blah......
I'm just not interested. When the old Agfa MSC200 quits for the last time, There will likely be no more digi prints here. Film developed printed by optical means, by machine or hand only.
As a side note, Notice how even television images are accepted? Bold contrasty, over saturated colors with odd display ratios and annoying flicker or refresh rates that make one dizzy and can't or won't make a proper circle or people that look normal? Tires on cars turn into eggs on each side of the screen or appear to be running flat across the entire screen. People appear only 5 feet tall and weigh 300 pounds. The general public is completely brainwashed and accept this crap.
Either they don't care or don't know any better.
ANYWHOO.... Sorry for the rant. I know everyone is not affected this way, it is just a pet peeve of mine....
It's unfortunate that people accept digi images the way they are. I guess if the image is in color and reasonably sharp its OK.
You'd be amazed how much the most non-enthusiasts do care about image quality, sometimes just unconsciously.It's the same for many with photography - an image is good enough, people without passion simply don't care to the same degree as enthusiasts and most of the time can't register the difference even when it's pointed out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?